Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60804

in Cicero, IllinoisPopulation 82,797

45.94/ 100

Ranked #21,416 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranked #1,086 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranked #318 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (bottom 15.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

29.7%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

46.1%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

220 intersections/sq mi

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

27.9%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

34.9%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

8.3%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

27.2%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Cicero, Illinois (ZIP 60804) lands in the bottom 33% nationally (21,416th) and the bottom 21% of Illinois (1,086th).

continue reading

Where this area bears down hardest, the measures speak first: modeled uninsured is in the top 1.2% nationally, and colon screening stands in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss settles in the top 0.3% nationally, and disaster risk lies in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 1.7% nationally, housing insecurity lands in the top 2.5% nationally, and food insecurity registers in the top 3.6% nationally. Crowded housing sits in the top 6.4% nationally. On the encouraging side, walkability rests in the top 1.8% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure is in the bottom 4.9% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 60304, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.5%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.6%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 1%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 0.5 (bottom 1%); chronic-disease standing 90.4 (top 10%) — 90 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,865 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults17.4%15.7–18.9
High blood pressure among adults27.2%24.9–29.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults3.9%3.5–4.2
Current asthma among adults9.0%8.0–9.9
Coronary heart disease among adults4.9%4.5–5.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
Depression among adults17.9%15.8–19.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.5%12.1–14.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.6%30.1–35.0
Obesity among adults35.5%31.9–39.0
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.1%12.6–18.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years29.7%26.6–32.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure68.4%65.4–71.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.9%68.8–74.5
Cholesterol screening among adults82.7%80.8–84.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years46.1%42.2–50.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.5%46.2–52.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.6%64.6–76.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.1%16.9–21.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.8%11.3–14.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.5%30.3–36.8
Short sleep duration among adults38.3%34.6–42.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.5%26.1–30.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.9–18.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.5%13.2–15.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.2%15.5–19.0
Any disability among adults33.2%30.2–36.1
Hearing disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.3
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.5–10.3
Mobility disability among adults14.8%13.3–16.2
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.6–5.4
Vision disability among adults8.6%7.9–9.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.5%28.4–34.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults34.9%32.0–37.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults26.1%23.4–29.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.9%25.3–30.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults14.8%13.3–16.4
Loneliness among adults37.8%34.6–41.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.6%12.1–15.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–6429.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)32.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)5.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle9.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription87.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate54.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population40.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households40.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+11.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age34.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$70,842$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$249,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,154$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.9 yr ± 0.5078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.50 years of 77.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured