Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62702

in Springfield, IllinoisPopulation 31,033

44.13/ 100

Ranked #23,294 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #1,192 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 12.9%)

Ranked #28 of 30 Springfield, IL ZIPs (bottom 6.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transit access

8.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

10.4%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.39 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.18 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Obesity

43.8%

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

12.1%

in the top 10.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

199 units

in the top 11.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

23.1%

in the top 13.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 62702, one of several in Springfield, Illinois ranks in the bottom 27% nationally (23,294th) and the bottom 12.9% of Illinois (1,192nd).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: transit stands in the top 1.7% nationally. Distance to an emergency room settles at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Physicians lies in the top 7.1% nationally, pharmacy resides in the top 8.8% nationally, and grocery lands in the top 8.8% nationally. Distance to a community health center registers at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Against that, modeled expected annual loss sits in the top 3.7% nationally, transportation noise rests in the top 8.1% nationally, and obesity is in the top 6.7% nationally. Households without a vehicle stands in the top 10.7% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 62704, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Springfield, IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.7 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $51,136 predicts 77.4 years — 2.8 years below.

    Ranked #3,836 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.7 ± 1.2 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.9 years — 4.3 years below them.

    Ranked #3,128 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.9%26.7–33.4
High blood pressure among adults39.8%35.7–44.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.5%7.7–9.3
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.2–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.8–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.6%8.6–10.7
Depression among adults22.6%19.3–26.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.1%12.3–16.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.5%32.4–40.9
Obesity among adults43.8%36.3–51.8
Stroke among adults4.2%3.9–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.9%13.1–19.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.4%8.1–10.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.0%74.1–79.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%75.5–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults85.4%83.6–87.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.0%56.6–67.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.1%52.1–60.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.2%60.2–77.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.7%13.8–20.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.9%15.6–20.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.3%23.1–31.8
Short sleep duration among adults38.3%31.9–45.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.5%20.8–26.4
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%16.9–21.2
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%13.9–17.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.0%14.3–17.9
Any disability among adults34.4%30.2–38.8
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.8–8.6
Independent living disability among adults10.6%9.6–11.8
Mobility disability among adults17.1%15.2–19.3
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.7–5.6
Vision disability among adults6.5%5.9–7.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.2%22.6–30.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.6%18.1–23.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults22.4%20.0–25.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.0%14.1–18.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.6–12.0
Loneliness among adults34.9%29.9–40.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.3%10.0–12.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–647.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)9.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)8.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle12.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription86.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate64.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population2.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households48.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+17.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age40.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$51,136$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$103,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$884$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.7 yr ± 0.6078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.60 years of 74.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured