Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62379

in Warsaw, IllinoisPopulation 1,854

51.45/ 100

Ranked #14,203 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranked #629 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Unemployment rate

13.3%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3 pCi/L

in the top 10.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

31.3%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.24%

in the bottom 11.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

21.5 days/year

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US79th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Warsaw, Illinois (ZIP 62379) lands in the top 44% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,203rd) and the top 46% of Illinois (629th).

continue reading

This area's strengths are easy to pick out across the measures: modeled transportation noise sits in the bottom 11.2% nationally, and tooth loss lands in the bottom 15% nationally. Working the other way, unemployment lies in the top 5.0% nationally, modeled radon stands in the top 10.4% nationally, and floodplain exposure rests in the top 9.4% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Recreation resides at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Home broadband subscription settles in the bottom 18% nationally. Childcare is at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs. Modeled extreme heat sits in the top 21% nationally.

Put simply, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". On the overall standing, ZIP 62305, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.5%26.8–34.8
High blood pressure among adults38.1%33.4–43.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.4–11.5
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.0–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.5–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.1%6.8–9.6
Depression among adults21.9%18.4–26.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.4–14.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.0%35.0–45.1
Obesity among adults38.1%29.6–47.7
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.4%6.6–10.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.1–8.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%75.5–81.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%75.7–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults88.7%86.8–90.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.3%62.0–72.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.1%61.2–69.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.1%64.6–81.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.8%14.6–21.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.2%11.5–17.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.1%18.5–28.1
Short sleep duration among adults34.6%28.2–42.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.1%15.1–21.2
Frequent mental distress among adults16.0%13.9–18.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%11.8–15.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.6%10.7–14.5
Any disability among adults29.8%25.1–34.9
Hearing disability among adults7.9%6.9–9.0
Independent living disability among adults7.7%6.6–8.9
Mobility disability among adults14.2%11.9–16.8
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.1–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.8–5.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.0%19.2–27.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.1%8.8–13.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.3–13.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.4–10.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.2–7.2
Loneliness among adults31.6%26.3–36.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.9–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–6412.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)4.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)13.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle3.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription80.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate82.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population0.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households58.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+26.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age42.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$62,200$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$103,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$820$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.3 yr ± 1.5178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.51 years of 81.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured