Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

51526

in Crescent, IowaPopulation 1,664

55.81/ 100

Ranked #8,507 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranked #205 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #72 of 113 Omaha, NE-IA ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

66.1 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

59%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.4 pCi/L

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST48th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.3%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.6%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.2%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

1.6%

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.0%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.1%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.6%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST47th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

Crescent, Iowa (ZIP 51526), in overall standing, comes out in the top 27% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,507th) and the top 22% of Iowa (205th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: modeled housing insecurity stands in the bottom 3.6% nationally, transportation resides in the bottom 4.4% nationally, and utility shutoff sits in the bottom 5.0% nationally. Poverty stands in the bottom 6.2% nationally, modeled food insecurity resides in the bottom 7.3% nationally, and modeled colon screening sits in the top 4.6% nationally. Pulling the other way, fatal road crashes stands in the top 1.7% nationally, and floodplain exposure resides in the top 2.7% nationally. Modeled radon sits in the top 5.7% nationally, and binge drinking stands in the top 7.9% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 51542, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Omaha, NE-IA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 7.2 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 57.8 — 51 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,444 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.8%26.6–32.8
High blood pressure among adults36.7%33.1–40.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.3%10.3–12.5
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.7–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.1–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%5.8–7.8
Depression among adults20.1%17.3–23.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.1%9.5–12.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.8%36.0–43.5
Obesity among adults35.7%30.5–40.9
Stroke among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.3%8.3–12.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.9%4.0–6.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.4%79.6–84.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.4%77.4–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults88.7%87.2–90.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.1%70.0–78.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.5%68.6–74.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.0%72.7–84.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.6%16.7–22.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.1%10.8–15.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.5%18.9–26.2
Short sleep duration among adults31.1%26.5–36.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.0%12.6–17.2
Frequent mental distress among adults14.1%12.4–15.9
Frequent physical distress among adults12.1%10.5–13.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.0%9.5–12.6
Any disability among adults27.4%23.7–31.0
Hearing disability among adults7.8%6.9–8.8
Independent living disability among adults6.2%5.3–7.0
Mobility disability among adults12.7%10.8–14.6
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.3%19.1–25.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.5–9.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.7–7.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.1–7.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.6%4.0–5.4
Loneliness among adults31.7%27.5–35.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.2%3.5–4.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate1.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–641.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)4.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription83.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)10.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate91.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households62.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+20.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age44.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$95,179$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$334,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$627$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.1 yr ± 1.2678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.26 years of 81.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured