Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62240

in East Carondelet, IllinoisPopulation 1,796

47.58/ 100

Ranked #19,464 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #964 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranked #154 of 234 St. Louis, MO-IL ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

18%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

36.8 per million

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

9.6%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

10.7%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

2.7 mi

in the bottom 13.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

17.9 days/year

in the top 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US75th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

85 days/year

in the top 30% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US70th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, East Carondelet, Illinois (ZIP 62240) comes out in the bottom 39% nationally (19,464th) and the bottom 30% of Illinois (964th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The profile opens on the burdens that define it most: PFOS in drinking water resides at the national maximum, unemployment rests in the top 2.5% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water lies at the national maximum. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk sits in the top 8.4% nationally, transportation noise settles in the top 9.2% nationally, and loud transportation noise registers in the top 11.5% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site stands in the bottom 13.5% nationally. More positively, housing-cost burden lands in the bottom 10.2% nationally. Crowded housing is at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Lead in tap water resides in the bottom 14.7% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 62236, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the St. Louis, MO-IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 45%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.1%26.3–33.6
High blood pressure among adults37.6%33.2–41.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.3–10.2
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.6–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.3–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%7.2–9.4
Depression among adults23.0%19.3–26.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.3–13.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.5%34.0–42.9
Obesity among adults36.3%29.2–43.3
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.7%12.8–19.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.4%6.1–8.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.6%74.2–80.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.6%74.9–81.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.1%85.2–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.1%60.1–70.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.0%56.1–63.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.1%64.0–79.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.6%15.4–22.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.4–18.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.4%20.1–29.1
Short sleep duration among adults36.7%30.5–43.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.4%16.8–22.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.4–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.3%12.5–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.0%12.3–16.0
Any disability among adults30.9%26.6–35.5
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.7–8.5
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.6
Mobility disability among adults14.6%12.6–16.8
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.3%21.6–29.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.2–15.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.8%10.7–15.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.2–12.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.3–8.3
Loneliness among adults33.1%28.2–38.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.0–8.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–640.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)3.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)18.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle4.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription92.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)10.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate87.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households52.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+10.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age30.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$96,063$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$89,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,063$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.5 yr ± 1.1078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.10 years of 75.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured