Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

61554

in Pekin, IllinoisPopulation 40,577

47.33/ 100

Ranked #19,750 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranked #982 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #58 of 67 Peoria, IL ZIPs (bottom 13.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.098 per 1,000 residents

in the top 11.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

217 units

in the top 11.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

75.1%

in the top 13.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

42.1 mi

in the top 17% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Pekin, Illinois (ZIP 61554) comes out in the bottom 38% nationally (19,750th) and the bottom 28% of Illinois (982nd).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: distance to an emergency room lands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Mental-health providers is in the top 11.1% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing resides in the top 11.2% nationally. Distance to a community health center rests at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home lies at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. By contrast, modeled expected annual loss sits in the top 3.2% nationally, and disaster risk settles in the top 8.0% nationally. PFOS in drinking water registers in the top 13.3% nationally, and modeled radon stands in the top 16% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 61534, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Peoria, IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.4 ± 0.7 years. A median household income of $65,194 predicts 78.4 years — 2.0 years below.

    Ranked #2,645 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.4 ± 0.7 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.7 years — 2.3 years below them.

    Ranked #1,806 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.4%25.9–33.0
High blood pressure among adults36.8%32.5–41.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.4–10.3
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.4–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.7–9.7
Depression among adults23.8%20.1–27.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.6–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.3%32.7–41.9
Obesity among adults38.1%30.2–46.3
Stroke among adults3.8%3.5–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.5%11.8–17.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.1%6.9–9.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.8%73.6–79.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%74.3–81.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.2%84.3–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.2%56.6–67.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.1%57.2–65.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.5%61.7–78.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%14.3–20.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.2%14.0–18.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.3%21.2–29.8
Short sleep duration among adults37.8%30.9–45.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.5%18.0–23.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.6–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.5%12.8–16.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.5%12.9–16.3
Any disability among adults32.2%28.1–36.6
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.7
Independent living disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.1
Mobility disability among adults15.2%13.3–17.2
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.7–4.4
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.6–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.5%20.9–28.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.7–16.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.7–16.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.7%10.1–13.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.9–8.8
Loneliness among adults33.4%28.4–38.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.6–8.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–648.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)8.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)5.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle8.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription88.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate72.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population1.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households52.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+19.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age42.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$65,194$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$127,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$836$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.4 yr ± 0.3778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.37 years of 76.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured