Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

61920

in Charleston, IllinoisPopulation 20,951

48.31/ 100

Ranked #18,534 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #917 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Slow internet speeds

3.0%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

330 units

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

17%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US91st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

53.3%

in the bottom 10.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.096 per 1,000 residents

in the top 11.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

32.7%

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

21.7%

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

35.9%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

10.3%

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US79th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Charleston, Illinois (ZIP 61920) sits in the bottom 42% nationally (18,534th) and the bottom 33% of Illinois (917th).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: subsidized affordable housing is in the top 7.4% nationally, and mental-health providers rests in the top 11.3% nationally. Distance to a community health center sits at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled high cholesterol registers in the bottom 8.5% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Distance to an emergency room resides in the bottom 15% nationally. Working the other way, slow internet speeds lies in the top 3.9% nationally, and modeled arsenic settles in the top 8.3% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss stands in the top 9.2% nationally, and homeownership is in the bottom 10.9% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. ZIP 61912, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 1%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 9.2 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 73.4 — 64 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,824 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.8%21.6–28.0
High blood pressure among adults31.8%27.6–36.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.8–8.3
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.7–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.4–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.6–8.4
Depression among adults24.4%20.5–28.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.3%8.7–11.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.7%28.4–37.2
Obesity among adults37.6%28.9–46.6
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.8%9.5–14.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.8%7.5–10.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.7%69.6–75.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.4%72.1–80.3
Cholesterol screening among adults81.8%79.4–84.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.9%58.6–69.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.6%54.8–62.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.7%62.0–78.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.4%14.8–22.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.3%12.2–16.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.1%19.7–28.9
Short sleep duration among adults37.3%30.4–44.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.9%17.2–22.7
Frequent mental distress among adults19.6%17.3–22.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.3%11.6–15.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.4%14.4–18.5
Any disability among adults32.7%28.1–37.7
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.6
Independent living disability among adults9.9%8.8–11.1
Mobility disability among adults13.3%11.4–15.2
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.9–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.6%20.9–28.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.9%15.3–20.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.3%15.8–20.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.5–15.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.3%9.0–11.6
Loneliness among adults35.9%30.5–41.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.9–10.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–648.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)6.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)34.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)5.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle8.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription85.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate53.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population3.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households61.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+15.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age30.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$52,429$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$149,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$812$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured