Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49509

in Wyoming, MichiganPopulation 28,152

49.76/ 100

Ranked #16,575 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #509 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #50 of 79 Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

0.1 mi

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

30.1%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

4.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

7.5%

in the top 13.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

5.1%

in the top 13.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

16.7%

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.2%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

1.7%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

21.2%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

5.6%

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 49509, one of several in Wyoming, Michigan places in the bottom 48% nationally (16,575th) and the bottom 48% of Michigan (509th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled high cholesterol resides in the bottom 3.5% nationally, and transit is in the top 5.5% nationally. Distance to a community health center lands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home stands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Walkability registers in the top 14.1% nationally, and park land settles in the top 14.2% nationally. Pulling the other way, distance to a Superfund site sits in the bottom 4.2% nationally, modeled transportation noise lies in the top 13.4% nationally, and crowded housing rests in the top 13.6% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity resides in the top 15% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 49315, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 9.8 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 77.9 — 68 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,218 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.8%21.3–26.1
High blood pressure among adults32.0%28.9–35.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.6%6.0–7.2
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%5.0–6.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
Depression among adults27.4%24.2–30.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.6%10.1–13.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened30.1%27.0–33.2
Obesity among adults38.0%33.0–42.8
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.2%9.1–13.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.0%11.2–14.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.4%69.2–75.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.2%73.9–80.2
Cholesterol screening among adults84.2%82.3–86.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.5%61.3–69.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.6%58.4–64.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.5%64.7–77.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.0%14.3–19.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.4%13.2–17.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.1%23.5–30.6
Short sleep duration among adults36.4%32.2–40.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.4%18.8–23.8
Frequent mental distress among adults18.6%16.6–20.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.7–16.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.4%14.6–18.2
Any disability among adults31.3%27.8–34.8
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Independent living disability among adults9.1%8.0–10.0
Mobility disability among adults12.8%11.1–14.3
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.6–4.3
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.2–6.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.4%23.1–30.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.2%18.5–24.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.7%15.4–20.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.7%14.6–19.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.5–12.1
Loneliness among adults34.7%30.6–39.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.4–12.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–6411.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)13.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle5.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription90.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate69.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population16.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households43.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+10.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age33.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$65,132$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$202,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,051$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.2 yr ± 0.8278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.82 years of 79.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured