Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55414

in Minneapolis, MinnesotaPopulation 35,007

49.97/ 100

Ranked #16,288 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranked #698 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #210 of 224 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI ZIPs (bottom 6.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

19.6%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

16.7%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

4.0%

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

2.4%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

1.4%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

42.7%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

9.7%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

4.7%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

15.1%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, ZIP 55414, one of several in Minneapolis, Minnesota sits in the bottom 49% nationally (16,288th) and the bottom 19% of Minnesota (698th).

continue reading

A few readings account for most of this area's strain: modeled loneliness stands in the top 1.4% nationally, slow internet speeds resides in the top 1.4% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise sits in the top 1.6% nationally. Homeownership stands in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site resides at the national minimum. On the better side, modeled high cholesterol sits in the bottom 0.9% nationally, and high blood pressure stands in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Modeled diabetes resides in the bottom 1.0% nationally, and coronary heart disease sits in the bottom 1.2% nationally. Modeled stroke stands in the bottom 1.2% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 55104, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.9%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 1%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.4%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.4%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.4%

13%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.5%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 1.0%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 1.0%

13%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 0.6 (bottom 1%); chronic-disease standing 99.1 (top 1%) — 99 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #18,181 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults8.0%7.3–8.7
High blood pressure among adults16.7%15.4–18.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults2.4%2.2–2.6
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.7–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults2.4%2.1–2.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
Depression among adults32.6%30.2–35.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults4.0%3.5–4.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened19.6%18.2–21.0
Obesity among adults24.8%22.4–27.3
Stroke among adults1.4%1.3–1.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.8%9.2–12.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.6%9.1–12.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure45.6%43.5–47.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults65.8%63.2–68.5
Cholesterol screening among adults65.0%62.1–67.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.9%62.4–67.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.2%52.0–56.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.2%70.3–77.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.6%18.6–22.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.0%10.5–13.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.7%19.4–24.3
Short sleep duration among adults29.7%27.5–32.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.6%15.7–19.7
Frequent mental distress among adults22.9%20.8–25.0
Frequent physical distress among adults9.4%8.4–10.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.4%20.1–24.8
Any disability among adults31.6%28.8–34.5
Hearing disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
Independent living disability among adults11.0%9.6–12.4
Mobility disability among adults6.1%5.4–6.8
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.3–2.8
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.7%22.4–27.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.4%21.5–27.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.1%16.3–21.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.4%13.5–17.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults16.5%14.6–18.4
Loneliness among adults42.7%39.9–45.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.7–11.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate36.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–644.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)6.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)68.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)6.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle23.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription81.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)51.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate15.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population16.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households43.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+5.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age22.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$51,966$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$440,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$1,425$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured