Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60526

in La Grange Park, IllinoisPopulation 13,459

64.67/ 100

Ranked #2,132 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 6.7%)

Ranked #79 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 5.8%)

Ranked #75 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transportation noise

21.8%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Park land

50.3%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

3.1%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

25.5%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

9.2%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.7%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.3%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.5%

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

12.8%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

La Grange Park, Illinois (ZIP 60526), in overall standing, comes out in the top 6.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,132nd) and the top 5.8% of Illinois (79th).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: park land lands in the top 2.4% nationally, modeled obesity rests in the bottom 6.3% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability settles in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Modeled transportation lands in the bottom 5.1% nationally, utility shutoff rests in the bottom 5.7% nationally, and short sleep settles in the bottom 7.5% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health lands in the bottom 5.4% nationally. Against that, modeled transportation noise rests in the top 2.2% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden settles in the top 3.5% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lands in the top 3.7% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 60521, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.2 ± 1.5 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.1 years — 2.1 years above them.

    Ranked #1,325 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 1.9 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 88.7 — 87 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,673 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.0%21.9–26.2
High blood pressure among adults28.9%26.5–31.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%9.1–10.7
Current asthma among adults9.3%8.4–10.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.8%4.2–5.6
Depression among adults19.2%17.0–21.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.6%7.6–9.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.8%33.0–38.5
Obesity among adults25.5%22.6–28.5
Stroke among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.8%7.3–10.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.0%5.0–7.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.6%73.8–79.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.6%77.1–81.8
Cholesterol screening among adults91.5%90.3–92.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.9%61.1–68.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults74.8%72.2–77.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.9%72.6–82.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.6%17.4–21.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.7%6.5–9.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.1%14.0–18.4
Short sleep duration among adults29.5%26.4–32.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.8%11.3–14.5
Frequent mental distress among adults12.5%11.2–13.9
Frequent physical distress among adults9.8%8.7–10.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.2%8.1–10.4
Any disability among adults22.5%20.2–25.0
Hearing disability among adults6.1%5.4–6.8
Independent living disability among adults5.6%4.9–6.4
Mobility disability among adults10.0%8.7–11.4
Self-care disability among adults2.4%2.1–2.7
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.7%18.3–23.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.0–9.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.2–7.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.6–8.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.1–5.3
Loneliness among adults30.0%27.1–32.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.7–4.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–643.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)4.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)57.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)3.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle8.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription92.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate72.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population9.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households45.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+21.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age44.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$120,308$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$439,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,439$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.2 yr ± 0.7478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.74 years of 81.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured