Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60490

in Bolingbrook, IllinoisPopulation 22,156

64.64/ 100

Ranked #2,146 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 6.7%)

Ranked #80 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 5.9%)

Ranked #76 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$150,531

in the top 3.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.0%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

3.9%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

9.9%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.3%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

98.2%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

9.0%

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.3%

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 60490, one of several in Bolingbrook, Illinois ranks in the top 6.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,146th) and the top 5.9% of Illinois (80th).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: household income resides in the top 3.9% nationally, and modeled hearing disability lands in the bottom 2.1% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease registers in the bottom 3.0% nationally, and cognitive disability sits in the bottom 4.7% nationally. Modeled stroke rests in the bottom 4.3% nationally, home broadband subscription is in the top 7.2% nationally, and modeled mobility disability stands in the bottom 5.6% nationally. Modeled independent living disability settles in the bottom 4.2% nationally. Against that, modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the top 6.7% nationally, and expected annual loss resides in the top 6.8% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 60565, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 29.3; chronic-disease standing 94.3 (top 10%) — 65 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,915 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.8%17.4–22.4
High blood pressure among adults29.2%25.9–32.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.5%4.9–6.0
Current asthma among adults9.1%8.1–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Depression among adults16.7%14.2–19.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%8.8–11.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.7%29.2–36.6
Obesity among adults34.6%29.5–39.9
Stroke among adults2.3%2.1–2.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.3%5.8–9.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%5.5–7.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.4%72.1–78.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.1%74.7–81.3
Cholesterol screening among adults88.9%87.4–90.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.9%52.8–63.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.6%67.3–73.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.7%65.9–80.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.0%15.1–21.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.2%7.8–10.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.0%17.8–24.5
Short sleep duration among adults38.0%32.6–43.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.6%12.8–16.7
Frequent mental distress among adults14.0%12.4–15.7
Frequent physical distress among adults9.7%8.5–10.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.9%8.7–11.1
Any disability among adults20.4%17.6–23.5
Hearing disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
Independent living disability among adults5.3%4.7–6.0
Mobility disability among adults9.0%7.8–10.4
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.3–2.7
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.1–3.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.8%22.5–29.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.6–12.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.4–10.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.7–11.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.4–6.9
Loneliness among adults33.2%28.9–37.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.2–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–643.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)4.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)58.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)5.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle0.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription98.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate89.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population21.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households45.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+10.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age37.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$150,531$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$395,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,964$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 0.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.88 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured