Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60440

in Bolingbrook, IllinoisPopulation 51,940

54.48/ 100

Ranked #10,099 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranked #391 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #222 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

995 units

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.2%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

58.7%

in the bottom 10.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

33.2%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

16.1%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

40.1%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

35.8%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 60440, one of several in Bolingbrook, Illinois, in overall standing, comes out in the top 31% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,099th) and the top 29% of Illinois (391st).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: subsidized affordable housing stands in the top 1.4% nationally. Distance to an emergency room resides at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled hearing disability sits in the bottom 8.1% nationally. Distance to a community health center stands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled coronary heart disease resides in the bottom 10.9% nationally. Distance to a nursing home sits at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Against that, modeled expected annual loss stands in the top 1.3% nationally, disaster risk resides in the top 4.3% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden sits in the top 4.8% nationally. Modeled colon screening stands in the bottom 10.8% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 60490, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 22.1; chronic-disease standing 80.6 — 59 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,266 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.4%19.9–25.0
High blood pressure among adults32.4%29.2–35.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.7%5.2–6.3
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.8–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.1%4.6–5.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%5.1–6.3
Depression among adults18.2%15.6–21.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.6–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.2%29.8–36.9
Obesity among adults40.1%34.7–45.7
Stroke among adults3.0%2.8–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.4%10.1–15.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.5%10.9–14.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.4%72.4–78.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.8%73.4–80.0
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.4–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.7%53.7–63.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.0%58.4–65.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.2%63.2–78.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.7%14.9–20.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.7%11.1–14.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.8%24.2–31.7
Short sleep duration among adults40.1%34.7–45.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.9%18.7–23.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.8–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.5%11.1–13.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.5%12.0–15.0
Any disability among adults27.4%24.2–30.8
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
Independent living disability among adults7.7%7.0–8.5
Mobility disability among adults12.8%11.3–14.4
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.4–4.0
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.9–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.5%25.0–32.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.0%16.7–21.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.4%14.5–18.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.1%14.0–18.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.4–10.5
Loneliness among adults35.8%31.4–40.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.3–10.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–6413.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)12.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)5.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription94.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate75.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population23.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households44.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+13.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age37.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$93,494$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$277,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,695$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.3 yr ± 0.7478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.74 years of 79.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured