Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60469

in Posen, IllinoisPopulation 5,205

48.40/ 100

Ranked #18,416 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranked #905 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #304 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

50.2%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

20.8%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

170 intersections/sq mi

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.7%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

22.7%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

10.7%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

27%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.2%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

28.7%

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Posen, Illinois (ZIP 60469) comes out in the bottom 43% nationally (18,416th) and the bottom 34% of Illinois (905th).

continue reading

The data is direct about where this area carries real strain: modeled colon screening sits in the bottom 2.1% nationally, uninsured settles in the top 4.0% nationally, and loud transportation noise registers in the top 4.5% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the top 5.4% nationally, housing insecurity lands in the top 5.9% nationally, and transportation noise is in the top 7.6% nationally. Modeled food insecurity resides in the top 8.7% nationally. More encouragingly, walkability rests in the top 3.8% nationally, and modeled hearing disability lies in the bottom 8.1% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure sits in the bottom 7.5% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, expected annual loss runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 60445, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 6.3 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 87.4 — 81 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,268 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.3%17.4–21.1
High blood pressure among adults28.7%26.3–31.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.7–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults4.9%4.3–5.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.5%4.8–6.2
Depression among adults18.5%16.3–20.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.7–13.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.6%29.9–35.1
Obesity among adults34.1%30.5–37.7
Stroke among adults3.0%2.8–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.5%12.9–18.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years20.8%17.0–24.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.9%67.9–73.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.1%71.2–76.8
Cholesterol screening among adults85.1%82.8–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years50.2%46.3–54.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.8%48.5–55.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.4%64.2–76.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.4%17.1–21.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.6%10.7–14.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.0%24.4–31.5
Short sleep duration among adults39.0%35.3–42.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.6%20.7–26.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.7–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.1%11.7–14.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.3%13.3–17.4
Any disability among adults30.1%26.7–33.4
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.9
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.7
Mobility disability among adults13.4%11.8–15.0
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.8
Vision disability among adults6.5%5.7–7.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.8%27.5–34.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.0%23.1–31.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.5%17.1–24.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.7%19.7–25.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.4–13.9
Loneliness among adults37.3%34.0–40.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.9–13.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–6412.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)21.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)6.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle2.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription94.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate68.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population21.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households27.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+7.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age33.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$73,676$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$173,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,397$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.3 yr ± 1.3478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.34 years of 76.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured