Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60120

in Elgin, IllinoisPopulation 51,225

50.34/ 100

Ranked #15,782 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranked #736 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranked #284 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

43 ppb

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

US99th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

52.3%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

21%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Park land

25.9%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

21.3%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.8%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

26.4%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 60120, one of several in Elgin, Illinois lands in the top 49% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,782nd) and the bottom 46% of Illinois (736th).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: park land is in the top 5.5% nationally. Set against that, lead in tap water sits in the top 0.2% nationally, modeled expected annual loss lands in the top 0.9% nationally, and modeled colon screening lies in the bottom 3.0% nationally. Modeled uninsured stands in the top 3.9% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site rests at the national minimum. Modeled disaster risk registers in the top 2.6% nationally, and housing insecurity resides in the top 7.3% nationally. Crowded housing settles in the top 8.9% nationally, and modeled food insecurity is in the top 9.3% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, lead in tap water runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. On the overall standing, ZIP 60103, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 14.2; chronic-disease standing 86.0 — 72 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,558 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.9%18.2–21.7
High blood pressure among adults28.6%26.3–31.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.2%4.8–5.5
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.6–10.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.2%4.8–5.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%5.3–6.4
Depression among adults18.8%16.8–21.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.6%11.3–13.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.1%30.6–35.6
Obesity among adults35.9%32.1–39.8
Stroke among adults3.0%2.8–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.4%11.4–15.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years21.0%18.9–23.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.6%67.9–73.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.3%70.5–76.0
Cholesterol screening among adults83.6%81.8–85.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years52.3%48.7–56.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.2%52.4–58.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.6%66.1–76.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.6%16.5–20.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.3%12.0–14.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.3%26.5–32.4
Short sleep duration among adults37.7%34.1–41.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.4%22.4–26.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%15.3–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.8%12.7–15.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.7%14.4–17.3
Any disability among adults30.4%27.9–33.2
Hearing disability among adults5.7%5.2–6.3
Independent living disability among adults8.8%8.1–9.6
Mobility disability among adults13.5%12.3–14.8
Self-care disability among adults4.4%4.1–4.8
Vision disability among adults7.0%6.5–7.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.2%26.4–31.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.4%24.0–28.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults21.3%19.0–23.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.3%19.3–23.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.8–13.2
Loneliness among adults36.0%32.7–39.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.3%10.1–12.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–6421.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)27.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)6.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle5.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription95.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate65.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population33.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households38.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+10.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age34.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$82,449$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$242,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,371$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.9 yr ± 0.6378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.63 years of 79.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured