ZIP code
60133
in Hanover Park, IllinoisPopulation 36,732
57.36/ 100
Ranked #6,926 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 22%)
Ranked #250 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 18%)
Ranked #184 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (top 49%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Industrial-pollution burden
in the top 1.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the top 2.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS97thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Crowded housing
10.1%
in the top 4.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
55.8%
in the bottom 5.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST5thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Loud transportation noise
2.4%
in the top 5.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS95thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
4.8%
in the bottom 5.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
27.5%
in the bottom 5.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Park land
19.4%
in the top 7.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
4.5%
in the bottom 5.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the top 8.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS92ndDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›The read
By the composite measure, Hanover Park, Illinois (ZIP 60133) sits in the top 22% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,926th) and the top 18% of Illinois (250th).
The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: modeled hearing disability sits in the bottom 5.0% nationally, modeled high blood pressure registers in the bottom 5.3% nationally, and park land lands in the top 7.2% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease resides in the bottom 5.7% nationally. Working the other way, modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the top 1.4% nationally, and expected annual loss settles in the top 2.6% nationally. Crowded housing stands in the top 4.5% nationally, and modeled colon screening is in the bottom 5.8% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise rests in the top 5.5% nationally, and disaster risk sits in the top 8.5% nationally.
Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. ZIP 60103, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 94%
21%
Mental Health
healthier than 89%
8%
Disability
healthier than 82%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 66%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 86%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 46%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 55%
11%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 3%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 14%
13%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 96%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 60%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 90%
8%
Disability
healthier than 78%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 68%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 87%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 54%
16%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 6%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 6%
13%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 87%
21%
Mental Health
healthier than 72%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 60%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 71%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 43%
11%
Disability
healthier than 53%
7%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 32%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 17%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 13%
13%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Below its nearby ZIPs
The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors
Estimated life expectancy is 79.5 ± 1.2 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.1 years — 1.6 years below them.
Ranked #1,494 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.
Heavy environment, light chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 3.5 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 93.8 (top 10%) — 90 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #17,901 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
60103
Illinoisshares a border
Score 64.53
Closest healthier
60107
Illinoisshares a border
Score 58.65
Similar health profile
60634
Illinois99% similar profile
Score 56.39
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 18.4% | 16.8–20.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 27.5% | 25.3–29.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 5.2% | 4.9–5.6 |
| Current asthma among adults | 8.9% | 8.2–9.8 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 4.5% | 4.1–4.8 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 4.8% | 4.4–5.3 |
| Depression among adults | 17.6% | 15.8–19.6 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 10.9% | 9.8–12.0 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 33.5% | 31.1–36.0 |
| Obesity among adults | 30.3% | 27.3–33.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.6% | 2.4–2.7 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 11.0% | 9.4–12.7 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 14.3% | 12.8–16.1 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 71.7% | 69.2–74.2 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 75.1% | 72.7–77.6 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 85.9% | 84.4–87.2 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 55.8% | 52.3–59.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 60.7% | 57.9–63.4 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 73.0% | 67.7–77.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 17.5% | 15.7–19.5 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 11.3% | 10.0–12.6 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 24.1% | 21.7–26.9 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 37.6% | 34.2–41.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 18.8% | 17.1–20.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 15.0% | 13.8–16.4 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 11.4% | 10.4–12.4 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 12.8% | 11.6–14.1 |
| Any disability among adults | 25.2% | 23.0–27.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 4.8% | 4.4–5.3 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.0% | 6.4–7.6 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 11.0% | 10.0–12.1 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.3% | 3.0–3.5 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.0% | 4.7–5.4 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 28.4% | 25.9–31.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 19.7% | 18.0–21.6 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 14.7% | 13.0–16.4 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 16.0% | 14.6–17.6 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 9.1% | 8.3–10.0 |
| Loneliness among adults | 35.6% | 32.7–38.5 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 8.3% | 7.5–9.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | IL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 12.5% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 16.7% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 16.5% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 28.9% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 21.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 5.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375 |
| Households without a vehicle | 5.9% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377 |
| Broadband subscription | 95.1% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 89.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 28.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377 |
| Homeownership rate | 77.5% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 80.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 10.1% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377 |
| Foreign-born population | 37.5% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378 |
| Single-parent households | 45.8% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 53.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372 |
| Population 65+ | 12.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378 |
| Median age | 35.3 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373 |
| Median household income | $91,763 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334 |
| Median home value | $274,200 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332 |
| Median gross rent | $1,594 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | IL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 79.5 yr ± 0.61 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.61 years of 79.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured