Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60510

in Batavia, IllinoisPopulation 29,038

62.96/ 100

Ranked #2,985 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.4%)

Ranked #109 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 8.0%)

Ranked #99 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

45.6 per million

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.7%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.5 mi

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

63.8%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.8%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

9.9%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

6.4 ppb

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

US93rd
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.6%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

13.1%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

Batavia, Illinois (ZIP 60510), on the composite measure, lands in the top 9.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,985th) and the top 8.0% of Illinois (109th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: modeled transportation registers in the bottom 5.1% nationally, food insecurity lands in the bottom 6.6% nationally, and cognitive disability resides in the bottom 4.7% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff lies in the bottom 8.6% nationally, and fair or poor health settles in the bottom 6.3% nationally. Working the other way, modeled air-toxics cancer risk stands in the top 1.4% nationally, and expected annual loss is in the top 3.5% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site rests in the bottom 5.6% nationally, and modeled pfas sits in the top 6.5% nationally. Lead in tap water registers in the top 7.1% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 60119, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 3.5 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 85.7 — 82 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,352 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 45.6 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 82.3 ± 1.7 years.

    Ranked #273 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.9%22.1–28.0
High blood pressure among adults29.7%26.4–33.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.5–10.3
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.4–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.1%4.5–5.8
Depression among adults19.7%16.8–23.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.4%8.2–10.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.9%31.1–39.0
Obesity among adults32.2%26.9–38.1
Stroke among adults2.7%2.4–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.1%5.7–9.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%4.7–6.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.1%72.7–79.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.1%74.8–81.4
Cholesterol screening among adults89.8%88.4–91.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.2%60.5–70.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.3%70.3–76.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.9%68.7–82.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.3%16.3–22.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.0%7.7–10.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.0%14.3–20.2
Short sleep duration among adults32.1%27.1–37.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.1%11.4–15.0
Frequent mental distress among adults13.9%12.3–15.8
Frequent physical distress among adults10.5%9.3–11.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.9%8.7–11.2
Any disability among adults22.0%19.0–25.4
Hearing disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Independent living disability among adults5.6%5.0–6.3
Mobility disability among adults9.6%8.3–11.0
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.3–2.7
Vision disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.5%17.6–23.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.5–9.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.4–7.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.3–8.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.1–5.4
Loneliness among adults29.3%25.2–33.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.9–5.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–643.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)2.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)57.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)2.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle5.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription93.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate77.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population6.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households51.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+18.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age41.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$121,622$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$392,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,359$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.3 yr ± 0.8678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.86 years of 82.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured