Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60169

in Hoffman Estates, IllinoisPopulation 33,401

62.47/ 100

Ranked #3,247 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 10.2%)

Ranked #116 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 8.5%)

Ranked #105 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

26.2%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

26.9%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Park land

20.2%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.5%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.0%

in the bottom 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.4%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 60169, one of several in Hoffman Estates, Illinois comes out in the top 10.2% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,247th) and the top 8.5% of Illinois (116th).

continue reading

Several readings land clearly in this area's favor and shape the picture: physicians resides in the top 5.3% nationally. Distance to an emergency room rests at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled obesity lies in the bottom 7.6% nationally, and high blood pressure sits in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Park land settles in the top 6.9% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease registers in the bottom 5.7% nationally. Modeled hearing disability stands in the bottom 6.4% nationally. Set against that, modeled expected annual loss lands in the top 3.1% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden is in the top 3.7% nationally. Modeled disaster risk resides in the top 7.9% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 60173, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 25.0; chronic-disease standing 94.3 (top 10%) — 69 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,335 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.4%17.6–21.1
High blood pressure among adults26.9%24.6–29.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.2%5.7–6.8
Current asthma among adults9.0%8.0–9.9
Coronary heart disease among adults4.5%4.1–5.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.9%4.3–5.4
Depression among adults18.2%16.1–20.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%9.0–11.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.2%31.6–36.7
Obesity among adults26.2%23.2–29.1
Stroke among adults2.6%2.4–2.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.5%7.8–11.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.2%9.0–11.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.7%69.8–75.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.3%73.6–78.7
Cholesterol screening among adults87.8%86.4–89.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.4%53.5–61.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.8%61.8–67.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.6%67.8–78.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.5%16.4–20.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.2%8.9–11.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.1%18.8–23.5
Short sleep duration among adults34.7%31.2–38.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.4%14.8–18.0
Frequent mental distress among adults14.0%12.7–15.4
Frequent physical distress among adults10.5%9.4–11.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.2%10.1–12.4
Any disability among adults23.6%21.3–25.8
Hearing disability among adults5.0%4.5–5.6
Independent living disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.0
Mobility disability among adults10.2%9.1–11.3
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.6–3.1
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.8–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.8%24.2–29.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.7%14.0–17.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.6%10.0–13.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.5%11.1–14.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.6–8.3
Loneliness among adults34.0%30.9–37.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.8–7.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–6415.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)11.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)42.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)4.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle6.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription94.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate65.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population38.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households41.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+14.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age36.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$90,774$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$306,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,670$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.3 yr ± 0.6478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.64 years of 79.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured