Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60504

in Aurora, IllinoisPopulation 39,358

63.60/ 100

Ranked #2,663 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 8.4%)

Ranked #103 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 7.6%)

Ranked #93 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

23 ppb

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

US99th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.0%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

3.7%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

26.4%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

442 units

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.2%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

31.3%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

9.0%

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 60504, one of several in Aurora, Illinois, overall, ranks in the top 8.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,663rd) and the top 7.6% of Illinois (103rd).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled hearing disability settles in the bottom 2.1% nationally, coronary heart disease is in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and high blood pressure sits in the bottom 4.0% nationally. Subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 5.2% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lies at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled stroke stands in the bottom 3.5% nationally, and high cholesterol rests in the bottom 5.1% nationally. Set against that, lead in tap water registers in the top 0.5% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss resides in the top 3.4% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the top 7.2% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, lead in tap water runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. ZIP 60502, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 23.6; chronic-disease standing 96.2 (top 10%) — 73 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,623 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults17.6%15.7–19.5
High blood pressure among adults26.4%23.8–29.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.2%4.8–5.7
Current asthma among adults9.2%8.3–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
Depression among adults17.6%15.4–20.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.0%8.0–10.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.3%28.3–34.2
Obesity among adults31.1%27.3–35.3
Stroke among adults2.2%2.0–2.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.6%8.2–11.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.6%7.6–9.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.8%67.7–73.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.0%72.9–78.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.6%85.1–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.3%53.1–61.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.1%62.1–68.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.4%69.4–80.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.9–19.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.2%8.9–11.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.7%17.2–22.5
Short sleep duration among adults38.4%34.1–42.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.7%13.2–16.4
Frequent mental distress among adults14.9%13.4–16.5
Frequent physical distress among adults9.9%8.9–10.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.3%10.1–12.5
Any disability among adults21.3%18.9–23.9
Hearing disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
Independent living disability among adults6.1%5.5–6.7
Mobility disability among adults9.0%8.0–10.0
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.4–2.9
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.5–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.5%23.6–29.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.2%12.6–15.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.9–12.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.4%11.0–13.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.6–8.2
Loneliness among adults34.7%31.2–38.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.3–8.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–645.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)8.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)50.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)5.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription96.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate59.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population24.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households36.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+9.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age34.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$98,008$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$286,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,965$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured