Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30519

in Buford, GeorgiaPopulation 59,997

58.50/ 100

Ranked #5,992 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #95 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 13.4%)

Ranked #69 of 206 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

37.9%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.3%

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

5.0%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 11.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.5 pCi/L

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US79th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

97.8 days/year

in the top 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US76th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 30519, one of several in Buford, Georgia ranks in the top 19% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,992nd) and the top 13.4% of Georgia (95th).

continue reading

The bright spots in the data define much of the story here: modeled hearing disability is in the bottom 9.0% nationally, and coronary heart disease registers in the bottom 9.7% nationally. Modeled stroke lies in the bottom 12.5% nationally, and lead in tap water is in the bottom 17% nationally. Modeled mobility disability registers in the bottom 16% nationally. On the other side, modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the top 6.3% nationally, loneliness is in the top 9.1% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 11.8% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss is in the top 16% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 30019, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.5 ± 1.0 years. The 42 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.6 years — 1.9 years above them.

    Ranked #1,433 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 14.1; chronic-disease standing 87.0 — 73 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,651 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 80.5 ± 1.0 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.5%18.3–22.9
High blood pressure among adults31.9%28.7–35.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.4%5.8–7.0
Current asthma among adults9.2%8.2–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
Depression among adults17.1%14.8–19.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.3%10.0–12.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.4%33.0–39.9
Obesity among adults33.0%28.4–38.0
Stroke among adults2.8%2.6–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.9%8.2–11.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.3%11.8–15.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.3%72.3–78.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.2%72.9–79.2
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.4–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.0%58.8–67.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.1%59.1–65.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.8%66.3–78.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.3%12.0–16.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.2%10.7–13.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.1%22.0–28.6
Short sleep duration among adults35.7%31.5–40.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.7%15.8–19.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%14.1–17.5
Frequent physical distress among adults11.9%10.7–13.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.8%11.5–14.2
Any disability among adults25.4%22.5–28.5
Hearing disability among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Independent living disability among adults7.2%6.5–7.9
Mobility disability among adults11.3%10.0–12.7
Self-care disability among adults3.3%3.1–3.6
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.2–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.3%22.2–28.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.7%12.9–16.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.9–11.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.0%11.4–14.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.9%7.0–8.8
Loneliness among adults37.9%33.7–42.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.7–8.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6410.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)10.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)40.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)4.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle2.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription95.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate75.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population21.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households39.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+12.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age37.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$102,553$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$413,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$2,064$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.5 yr ± 0.4978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.49 years of 80.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured