Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60110

in Carpentersville, IllinoisPopulation 38,558

53.65/ 100

Ranked #11,168 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #447 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #243 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

53.1%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

18.8%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US95th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

26.9%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

373 units

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

31.2%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

10 µg/L

in the bottom 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.6%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Park land

15.9%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.1%

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Carpentersville, Illinois (ZIP 60110) places in the top 35% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,168th) and the top 33% of Illinois (447th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled high blood pressure rests in the bottom 4.6% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing resides in the top 6.4% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol is in the bottom 4.9% nationally, and lithium in drinking water lands in the bottom 7.1% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease stands in the bottom 6.3% nationally, park land registers in the top 8.5% nationally, and modeled hearing disability settles in the bottom 7.2% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled colon screening sits in the bottom 3.5% nationally, uninsured lies in the top 5.6% nationally, and expected annual loss rests in the top 5.3% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 60010, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 29.0; chronic-disease standing 91.1 (top 10%) — 62 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,621 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults18.9%16.6–21.5
High blood pressure among adults26.9%23.7–30.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.9%4.5–5.5
Current asthma among adults9.3%8.2–10.5
Coronary heart disease among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.0%4.4–5.6
Depression among adults18.6%15.8–21.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.4%10.0–13.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.2%27.7–35.1
Obesity among adults37.7%32.0–44.0
Stroke among adults2.6%2.4–2.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.4%11.0–16.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years18.8%16.4–21.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.1%65.5–72.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.6%68.8–76.4
Cholesterol screening among adults83.4%81.5–85.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years53.1%48.1–58.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.8%55.2–62.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.6%63.7–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.0%16.0–22.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.3%10.6–14.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.5%23.5–31.8
Short sleep duration among adults37.9%32.3–44.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.8%19.1–24.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%14.8–18.8
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.4–14.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.8%13.1–16.8
Any disability among adults27.8%24.2–31.7
Hearing disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.9
Independent living disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.8
Mobility disability among adults11.6%10.1–13.2
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.5–6.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.2%24.4–32.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.5%19.6–25.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.9%15.6–20.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.2%16.7–21.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.6%9.3–12.0
Loneliness among adults35.1%30.4–40.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.8–11.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–6415.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)23.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)5.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle3.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription91.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate71.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population29.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households38.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+9.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age33.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$87,906$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$233,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,398$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.9 yr ± 1.0278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.02 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured