Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60073

in Round Lake, IllinoisPopulation 62,868

54.93/ 100

Ranked #9,519 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #365 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranked #216 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

53.9%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

10 µg/L

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.7%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.2%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.7 mi

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

254 units

in the top 9.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Park land

12.3%

in the top 10.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

29.6%

in the bottom 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

15.7%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Round Lake, Illinois (ZIP 60073) ranks in the top 30% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,519th) and the top 27% of Illinois (365th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: lithium in drinking water registers in the bottom 7.3% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease rests in the bottom 7.0% nationally. Modeled hearing disability stands in the bottom 8.1% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing lies in the top 9.8% nationally. Park land lands in the top 10.2% nationally. Distance to a community health center sits at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled high blood pressure is in the bottom 9.8% nationally. On the other side, modeled colon screening settles in the bottom 4.0% nationally, modeled expected annual loss resides in the top 3.1% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site registers in the bottom 9.7% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Close by, ZIP 60030, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults18.9%16.6–21.2
High blood pressure among adults29.6%26.4–32.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.3–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.4%4.8–6.0
Depression among adults19.1%16.3–22.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.4%9.9–13.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.0%30.4–37.5
Obesity among adults36.7%31.3–42.1
Stroke among adults2.7%2.5–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.1%11.6–17.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.7%13.7–17.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.3%65.6–72.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.3%69.4–76.8
Cholesterol screening among adults84.8%82.8–86.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years53.9%49.2–58.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.5%56.0–63.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.3%64.9–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.9%14.1–19.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.1%11.3–14.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.4%20.9–28.1
Short sleep duration among adults35.3%30.4–40.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.3%18.0–22.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.6–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.5%11.1–14.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.4%12.8–16.2
Any disability among adults26.7%23.4–30.1
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.9
Independent living disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.7
Mobility disability among adults11.8%10.4–13.4
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.4–4.0
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.2–6.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.1%23.7–30.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.3%17.8–22.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.2%14.1–18.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.2%15.1–19.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.6–10.9
Loneliness among adults33.6%29.3–38.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.2–10.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–6414.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)19.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)6.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle2.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription96.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate78.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population25.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households44.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+8.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age34.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$98,514$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$231,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,615$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.4 yr ± 0.6278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.62 years of 79.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured