Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60044

in Lake Bluff, IllinoisPopulation 10,312

70.23/ 100

Ranked #547 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 1.8%)

Ranked #22 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 1.7%)

Ranked #22 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (top 5.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lack of transportation

4.0%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.7%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

8.4%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.8%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.78 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.2%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

73.6%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$134,724

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.3%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

The read

Lake Bluff, Illinois (ZIP 60044), by its composite score, sits in the top 1.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (547th) and the top 1.7% of Illinois (22nd).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: modeled transportation stands in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and utility shutoff registers in the bottom 2.3% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability settles in the bottom 1.1% nationally, and food insecurity sits in the bottom 3.1% nationally. Outpatient lies in the top 3.2% nationally, modeled housing insecurity rests in the bottom 3.3% nationally, and mental-health providers resides in the top 4.4% nationally. Household income is in the top 6.1% nationally, and modeled short sleep lands in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled pfas stands in the top 3.4% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 60045, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 99%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 25.0; chronic-disease standing 89.3 — 64 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,838 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.8%20.0–25.5
High blood pressure among adults31.5%28.0–34.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.6–10.4
Current asthma among adults8.8%7.7–9.9
Coronary heart disease among adults5.0%4.5–5.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.4%3.8–5.0
Depression among adults17.6%14.9–20.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.4%8.1–10.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.0%34.2–41.8
Obesity among adults28.8%24.1–33.7
Stroke among adults2.5%2.3–2.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years4.7%3.7–5.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.9%4.1–5.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.7%73.3–79.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%75.7–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults91.2%89.9–92.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.9%64.6–73.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.3%72.5–78.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.9%71.4–83.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.9%13.2–18.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.4%6.1–8.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults14.7%12.2–17.3
Short sleep duration among adults28.3%24.0–33.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults11.5%9.9–13.2
Frequent mental distress among adults11.9%10.4–13.5
Frequent physical distress among adults9.2%8.0–10.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults8.4%7.3–9.6
Any disability among adults19.6%16.9–22.5
Hearing disability among adults5.6%4.9–6.3
Independent living disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
Mobility disability among adults8.9%7.6–10.3
Self-care disability among adults2.1%1.9–2.4
Vision disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.9%17.1–23.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.6–8.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.1–6.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.2–7.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.0%3.5–4.7
Loneliness among adults27.7%23.8–31.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.7%3.1–4.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–642.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)4.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)67.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)2.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle3.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription97.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate71.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population16.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households50.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+23.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age44.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$134,724$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$599,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,750$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.1 yr ± 0.8978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.89 years of 82.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured