Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

59330

in Glendive, MontanaPopulation 8,133

53.68/ 100

Ranked #11,114 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #69 of 341 Montana ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

175.6 mi

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.92 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST33rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.4%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.24 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

16.3 per million

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.1%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST31st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

32.8%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Glendive, Montana (ZIP 59330) stands in the top 35% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,114th) and the top 20% of Montana (69th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: distance to a Superfund site sits in the top 1.4% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the bottom 1.7% nationally. Grocery stands in the top 5.2% nationally. Distance to an emergency room sits at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the bottom 6.3% nationally. Working the other way, modeled disaster risk stands in the top 0.2% nationally, modeled expected annual loss sits in the top 0.4% nationally, and walkability resides in the bottom 2.3% nationally. Modeled binge drinking stands in the top 4.8% nationally, and fine-particle sits in the top 9.4% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. ZIP 59315, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 79%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 76%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 10%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.0%25.8–32.5
High blood pressure among adults33.4%29.5–37.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.7–10.7
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.8–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.1–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.3–8.3
Depression among adults23.6%20.1–27.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.2%8.8–11.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.8%28.8–37.0
Obesity among adults33.2%26.6–40.4
Stroke among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.0%7.2–11.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.9%7.3–10.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.9%70.4–77.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.4%66.2–74.4
Cholesterol screening among adults83.2%81.1–85.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.8%60.8–70.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.5%63.1–69.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.1%66.4–80.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.4%17.1–24.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.1%12.0–16.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.7%18.8–27.1
Short sleep duration among adults32.5%26.9–38.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.1%15.6–20.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.3–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.3%12.6–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%12.6–16.3
Any disability among adults30.4%26.3–34.9
Hearing disability among adults8.7%7.7–9.8
Independent living disability among adults8.0%7.0–9.0
Mobility disability among adults13.4%11.5–15.4
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.5%18.3–25.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%8.8–13.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.0–9.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.3–10.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.1–8.2
Loneliness among adults30.8%26.1–35.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.2–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.7% (1.9–27.5%) n=360
Uninsured 18–649.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.1% (0.0–33.1%) n=357
No HS diploma (25+)7.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (0.0–14.1%) n=360
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.6% (12.3–46.1%) n=360
Unemployment rate (16+)2.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.8% (0.0–10.2%) n=357
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–9.5%) n=360
Broadband subscription88.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.1–100.0%) n=360
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.3–37.2%) n=360
Homeownership rate71.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.0% (56.9–95.8%) n=360
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–6.6%) n=360
Foreign-born population0.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–4.9%) n=360
Single-parent households54.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.3% (39.9–84.5%) n=356
Population 65+20.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.0% (12.9–44.0%) n=360
Median age41.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.0 yr (32.9–62.3) n=358
Median household income$70,964$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,875 ($44,980–$95,192) n=321
Median home value$185,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$292,450 ($127,430–$548,550) n=312
Median gross rent$812$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$877 ($544–$1,329) n=213
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.1 yr ± 1.1778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.7 yr (76.7–83.7) n=358

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.17 years of 78.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured