Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

59270

in Sidney, MontanaPopulation 8,571

53.16/ 100

Ranked #11,837 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranked #83 of 341 Montana ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

207 mi

in the top 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

22%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.35 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.23 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.35 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.81 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

31%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

62.7%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Sidney, Montana (ZIP 59270) sits in the top 37% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,837th) and the top 24% of Montana (83rd).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: distance to a Superfund site lies in the top 0.9% nationally, grocery registers in the top 3.0% nationally, and mental-health providers is in the top 3.3% nationally. Elder services lies in the top 3.8% nationally. Distance to an emergency room registers at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Civic is in the top 6.1% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol lies in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled disaster risk registers in the top 0.4% nationally, and expected annual loss is in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled binge drinking lies in the top 1.9% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 58634, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 85%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.6%22.7–28.4
High blood pressure among adults30.6%27.0–34.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.5%7.7–9.4
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.7–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.4%5.6–7.2
Depression among adults23.3%20.1–26.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.9%7.7–10.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.0%27.4–34.6
Obesity among adults38.1%31.8–44.3
Stroke among adults3.1%2.9–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.8%10.3–15.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.4%8.0–11.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.6%68.1–74.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults69.7%65.7–73.5
Cholesterol screening among adults81.9%79.8–84.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.3%55.0–65.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.0%57.3–64.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.2%63.9–79.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults22.0%18.7–25.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.1%12.1–16.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.4%19.7–27.2
Short sleep duration among adults33.8%27.9–39.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.2%15.0–19.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.1%15.2–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults13.5%12.0–15.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.2%12.6–16.0
Any disability among adults28.9%25.2–32.6
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.5
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.6–8.3
Mobility disability among adults11.6%10.1–13.2
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.5%18.4–24.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.9–12.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.0–8.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.7–10.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.1–7.9
Loneliness among adults29.0%24.9–33.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.3–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.7% (1.9–27.5%) n=360
Uninsured 18–645.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.1% (0.0–33.1%) n=357
No HS diploma (25+)5.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (0.0–14.1%) n=360
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.6% (12.3–46.1%) n=360
Unemployment rate (16+)2.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.8% (0.0–10.2%) n=357
Households without a vehicle5.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–9.5%) n=360
Broadband subscription87.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.1–100.0%) n=360
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.3–37.2%) n=360
Homeownership rate63.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.0% (56.9–95.8%) n=360
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–6.6%) n=360
Foreign-born population3.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–4.9%) n=360
Single-parent households57.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.3% (39.9–84.5%) n=356
Population 65+17.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.0% (12.9–44.0%) n=360
Median age39.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.0 yr (32.9–62.3) n=358
Median household income$72,630$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,875 ($44,980–$95,192) n=321
Median home value$267,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$292,450 ($127,430–$548,550) n=312
Median gross rent$938$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$877 ($544–$1,329) n=213
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.1 yr ± 0.9478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.7 yr (76.7–83.7) n=358

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.94 years of 78.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured