Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

59327

in Forsyth, MontanaPopulation 2,610

45.03/ 100

Ranked #22,372 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranked #259 of 341 Montana ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

0.68 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST18th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

6.1%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.38 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.38 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.2%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

49.8 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.8%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

73.3 mi

in the top 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST75th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

19.2 per million

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Forsyth, Montana (ZIP 59327), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 30% nationally (22,372nd) and the bottom 24% of Montana (259th).

continue reading

The measures that define this area's challenges come through directly: walkability rests in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and modeled energy burden resides in the top 2.5% nationally. Modeled fine-particle is in the top 3.8% nationally, and fatal road crashes lands in the top 4.0% nationally. Modeled hearing disability stands in the top 5.2% nationally. On the stronger side, grocery registers in the top 2.6% nationally, floodplain exposure settles at the national minimum, and elder services sits in the top 3.5% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lies at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Distance to a Superfund site rests in the top 6.0% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 59038, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.7%32.2–39.2
High blood pressure among adults43.0%39.0–47.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.5%10.4–12.6
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.2–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults9.5%8.4–10.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.5–11.3
Depression among adults23.1%19.9–26.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.5%11.7–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.2%32.2–40.5
Obesity among adults36.3%30.1–43.1
Stroke among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.2%13.2–19.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.8%7.9–12.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.7%75.8–81.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.4%70.8–77.8
Cholesterol screening among adults84.5%82.6–86.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.6%58.4–68.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.3%54.6–62.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.7%69.3–83.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.0%14.2–20.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.2%13.7–19.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.0%21.8–30.5
Short sleep duration among adults31.8%26.4–37.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.4%19.3–25.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.0–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.6%14.6–18.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.2%13.2–17.2
Any disability among adults36.8%32.4–41.3
Hearing disability among adults11.8%10.5–13.1
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.4–10.9
Mobility disability among adults17.9%15.4–20.5
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.4
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.2–6.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.3%18.9–26.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.2–16.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.1–11.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.6–10.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.7–9.0
Loneliness among adults31.8%27.2–36.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.7–7.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.7% (1.9–27.5%) n=360
Uninsured 18–6416.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.1% (0.0–33.1%) n=357
No HS diploma (25+)10.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (0.0–14.1%) n=360
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.6% (12.3–46.1%) n=360
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.8% (0.0–10.2%) n=357
Households without a vehicle6.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–9.5%) n=360
Broadband subscription74.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.1–100.0%) n=360
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)39.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.3–37.2%) n=360
Homeownership rate65.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.0% (56.9–95.8%) n=360
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–6.6%) n=360
Foreign-born population4.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–4.9%) n=360
Single-parent households66.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.3% (39.9–84.5%) n=356
Population 65+28.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.0% (12.9–44.0%) n=360
Median age38.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.0 yr (32.9–62.3) n=358
Median household income$52,639$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,875 ($44,980–$95,192) n=321
Median home value$233,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$292,450 ($127,430–$548,550) n=312
Median gross rent$828$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$877 ($544–$1,329) n=213
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.6 yr ± 2.0778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.7 yr (76.7–83.7) n=358

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.07 years of 83.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured