Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

59014

in Bridger, MontanaPopulation 1,510

45.51/ 100

Ranked #21,862 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #256 of 341 Montana ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranked #28 of 30 Billings, MT ZIPs (bottom 6.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

66.2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.1 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST43rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST56th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.4%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST39th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

12 mi

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST50th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.67 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

11.5 days/year

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.3%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.1%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.1%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Bridger, Montana (ZIP 59014) ranks in the bottom 32% nationally (21,862nd) and the bottom 25% of Montana (256th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the bottom 5.1% nationally, and civic settles in the top 8.1% nationally. Modeled humid heat rests in the bottom 8.5% nationally. By contrast, fatal road crashes lands in the top 1.7% nationally, walkability settles in the bottom 3.1% nationally, and modeled fine-particle rests in the top 6.9% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lands in the top 7.9% nationally, slow internet speeds settles in the top 8.7% nationally, and modeled hearing disability rests in the top 8.7% nationally. Modeled energy burden lands in the top 8.4% nationally.

For context, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 59007, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Billings, MT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.9%33.2–40.9
High blood pressure among adults43.3%39.0–47.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.6%10.6–12.9
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.1–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults9.3%8.3–10.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.7–11.3
Depression among adults23.8%20.4–27.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.5%11.7–15.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.2%34.0–42.9
Obesity among adults35.4%28.8–43.1
Stroke among adults4.8%4.3–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.4%10.9–16.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.3%7.6–11.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.8%74.7–81.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.1%71.4–78.7
Cholesterol screening among adults85.7%83.9–87.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.8%59.6–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.5%57.6–65.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.1%63.6–79.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.8%14.8–21.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.5%13.8–19.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.5%21.3–30.3
Short sleep duration among adults33.3%27.4–39.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.4%19.4–25.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.4–18.6
Frequent physical distress among adults16.8%14.8–19.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.7%12.8–16.6
Any disability among adults35.4%31.0–40.4
Hearing disability among adults11.1%9.9–12.4
Independent living disability among adults9.1%8.0–10.3
Mobility disability among adults17.3%15.1–20.0
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.3
Vision disability among adults5.6%5.0–6.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.9%18.6–25.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.3–14.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.9–11.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.6–10.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.5–8.4
Loneliness among adults29.8%25.3–34.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.8–7.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.7% (1.9–27.5%) n=360
Uninsured 18–6411.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.1% (0.0–33.1%) n=357
No HS diploma (25+)6.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (0.0–14.1%) n=360
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.6% (12.3–46.1%) n=360
Unemployment rate (16+)6.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.8% (0.0–10.2%) n=357
Households without a vehicle3.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–9.5%) n=360
Broadband subscription78.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.1–100.0%) n=360
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.3–37.2%) n=360
Homeownership rate74.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.0% (56.9–95.8%) n=360
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–6.6%) n=360
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–4.9%) n=360
Single-parent households66.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.3% (39.9–84.5%) n=356
Population 65+22.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.0% (12.9–44.0%) n=360
Median age49.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.0 yr (32.9–62.3) n=358
Median household income$55,234$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,875 ($44,980–$95,192) n=321
Median home value$306,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$292,450 ($127,430–$548,550) n=312
Median gross rent$846$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$877 ($544–$1,329) n=213
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.0 yr ± 1.1978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.7 yr (76.7–83.7) n=358

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.19 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured