Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

59301

in Miles City, MontanaPopulation 11,643

50.47/ 100

Ranked #15,600 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranked #154 of 341 Montana ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

1 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST38th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

104.2 mi

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST83rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.2%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

19.5 per million

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.1%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST35th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

33%

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

45.9%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

22.5 days/year

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US79th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Miles City, Montana (ZIP 59301) stands in the top 49% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,600th) and the top 45% of Montana (154th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The bright spots in the data define much of the story here: distance to a Superfund site lies in the top 3.5% nationally. Distance to an emergency room is at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the bottom 7.3% nationally. Distance to a community health center lies at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. On the other side, walkability is in the bottom 2.7% nationally, modeled expected annual loss registers in the top 3.8% nationally, and modeled binge drinking lies in the top 5.5% nationally. Modeled disaster risk is in the top 7.8% nationally, fine-particle registers in the top 8.0% nationally, and radon lies in the top 11.3% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. ZIP 59336, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 65%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.4 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $71,332 predicts 78.7 years — 2.4 years below.

    Ranked #3,260 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.4 ± 1.5 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.8 years — 3.4 years below them.

    Ranked #2,681 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.2%27.0–33.3
High blood pressure among adults33.9%30.2–37.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.8–10.6
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.2–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.6%6.7–8.4
Depression among adults24.0%20.6–27.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.5%9.1–12.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.0%29.0–36.8
Obesity among adults32.3%26.1–38.6
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.2%12.4–18.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.1%7.7–10.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.8%71.5–77.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.1%68.0–75.9
Cholesterol screening among adults82.3%80.2–84.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.7%59.7–69.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.0%58.4–65.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.5%66.9–81.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.2%16.8–23.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.4%12.4–16.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.7%20.0–27.5
Short sleep duration among adults32.4%27.0–38.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.7%16.4–21.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.1–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults14.3%12.7–16.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.6%13.0–16.3
Any disability among adults32.6%28.6–36.4
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.0
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.3
Mobility disability among adults13.5%11.7–15.2
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.3–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.1%18.2–24.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.7%10.0–13.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.1–9.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.6–10.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.5–8.3
Loneliness among adults30.5%26.2–35.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.7–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.7% (1.9–27.5%) n=360
Uninsured 18–6411.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.1% (0.0–33.1%) n=357
No HS diploma (25+)4.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (0.0–14.1%) n=360
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.6% (12.3–46.1%) n=360
Unemployment rate (16+)3.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.8% (0.0–10.2%) n=357
Households without a vehicle5.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–9.5%) n=360
Broadband subscription88.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.1–100.0%) n=360
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.3–37.2%) n=360
Homeownership rate69.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.0% (56.9–95.8%) n=360
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–6.6%) n=360
Foreign-born population1.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–4.9%) n=360
Single-parent households52.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.3% (39.9–84.5%) n=356
Population 65+20.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.0% (12.9–44.0%) n=360
Median age42.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.0 yr (32.9–62.3) n=358
Median household income$71,332$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,875 ($44,980–$95,192) n=321
Median home value$217,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$292,450 ($127,430–$548,550) n=312
Median gross rent$897$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$877 ($544–$1,329) n=213
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.3 yr ± 0.7878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.7 yr (76.7–83.7) n=358

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.78 years of 76.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured