Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99518

in Anchorage, AlaskaPopulation 9,764

52.38/ 100

Ranked #12,939 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranked #43 of 211 Alaska ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #15 of 27 Anchorage, AK ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

70 per million

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

68.2%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

31.6%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

88.1%

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST50th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

99 intersections/sq mi

in the top 10.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

130 units

in the top 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 99518, one of several in Anchorage, Alaska ranks in the top 40% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,939th) and the top 20% of Alaska (43rd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: recreation lands in the top 2.0% nationally, and transit settles in the top 7.2% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol rests in the bottom 5.7% nationally, and childcare lands in the top 10.3% nationally. Walkability settles in the top 10.5% nationally. On the other side, modeled air-toxics cancer risk rests in the top 0.2% nationally, expected annual loss lands in the top 1.8% nationally, and disaster risk settles in the top 7.9% nationally. Modeled mammography rests in the bottom 8.1% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water lands in the top 9.5% nationally.

For context, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 99502, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 73%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.8 ± 1.8 years. A median household income of $93,995 predicts 79.8 years — 3.0 years below.

    Ranked #4,167 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 70.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 76.8 ± 1.8 years.

    Ranked #25 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.7%20.7–25.0
High blood pressure among adults32.2%29.7–35.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.3%5.8–6.9
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%5.1–6.6
Depression among adults22.2%19.8–25.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.4%8.3–10.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.6%29.1–34.6
Obesity among adults36.7%32.8–41.0
Stroke among adults3.0%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.4%9.4–13.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.8%8.4–11.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure67.2%64.5–70.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.4%67.4–73.5
Cholesterol screening among adults79.7%77.5–81.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.4%56.7–64.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.8%56.9–62.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.2%62.1–73.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.7%15.6–20.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.2%13.2–17.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.0%18.3–24.1
Short sleep duration among adults37.0%33.5–40.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.8%16.8–21.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.3–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.5–14.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.1%12.6–15.9
Any disability among adults28.9%26.0–32.1
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.4–8.0
Independent living disability among adults7.7%6.9–8.7
Mobility disability among adults11.8%10.4–13.4
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.2%22.4–28.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.5%12.6–16.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.2–12.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.3%11.6–15.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.3–10.7
Loneliness among adults34.1%30.9–37.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.9–10.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.7% (1.4–38.0%) n=230
Uninsured 18–6416.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28620.8% (8.5–50.0%) n=225
No HS diploma (25+)3.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.4% (1.4–25.1%) n=230
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.0% (0.0–37.4%) n=230
Unemployment rate (16+)1.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2748.6% (0.0–29.5%) n=226
Households without a vehicle6.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,32231.1% (1.0–95.5%) n=228
Broadband subscription91.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.8% (49.6–96.0%) n=228
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.0% (0.0–33.2%) n=228
Homeownership rate57.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32271.7% (45.5–94.4%) n=228
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3228.5% (0.0–48.6%) n=228
Foreign-born population7.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–11.1%) n=231
Single-parent households48.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08744.2% (18.7–68.2%) n=221
Population 65+10.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55312.7% (3.0–29.7%) n=231
Median age31.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.7 yr (22.6–53.6) n=226
Median household income$93,995$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,823 ($39,905–$108,850) n=197
Median home value$323,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,500 ($66,830–$395,940) n=178
Median gross rent$1,649$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,078 ($688–$1,571) n=143
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 0.9278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (75.1–84.7) n=222

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.92 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured