Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

59925

in Marion, MontanaPopulation 1,532

45.59/ 100

Ranked #21,791 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #255 of 341 Montana ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.61 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

3.6%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

7 days/year

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST41st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

45.7 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.61 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

14.8 mi

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

16.1 mi

in the top 7.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST75th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.4%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

68.2%

in the top 10.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

Marion, Montana (ZIP 59925), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 32% nationally (21,791st) and the bottom 25% of Montana (255th).

continue reading

The profile opens on the burdens that define it most: modeled fine-particle settles in the top 1.9% nationally, fatal road crashes registers in the top 5.1% nationally, and distance to a nursing home stands in the top 5.5% nationally. Slow internet speeds lands in the top 8.2% nationally. More positively, mental-health providers is in the top 0.6% nationally, and modeled humid heat resides in the bottom 4.4% nationally. Outpatient rests in the top 5.2% nationally, and floodplain exposure lies in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits in the top 7.2% nationally. Modeled extreme heat settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Held up against its neighbors, mental-health providers runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 59901, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.7%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.0%30.1–36.0
High blood pressure among adults35.7%32.5–38.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.6–11.7
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.2–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.3–9.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%8.2–10.9
Depression among adults24.6%21.8–27.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.7%10.1–13.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.0%32.8–39.3
Obesity among adults33.8%29.5–38.3
Stroke among adults4.3%3.9–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.4%16.2–23.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.0%8.1–12.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.7%72.6–78.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.2%68.9–75.3
Cholesterol screening among adults83.2%81.2–85.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.9%60.7–69.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.3%57.0–63.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.6%63.7–76.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.4%15.9–21.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.1%13.8–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.9%19.6–26.5
Short sleep duration among adults32.7%28.7–37.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.9%19.2–25.0
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%15.1–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults16.2%14.4–18.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.2%13.4–17.2
Any disability among adults35.0%31.3–38.9
Hearing disability among adults10.0%8.9–11.2
Independent living disability among adults9.0%7.9–10.2
Mobility disability among adults15.6%13.6–17.9
Self-care disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.1
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.7–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.2%19.2–25.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.9%10.8–15.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.7%7.9–11.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.4–11.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.0–9.2
Loneliness among adults29.4%25.8–33.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.2–8.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.7% (1.9–27.5%) n=360
Uninsured 18–6412.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.1% (0.0–33.1%) n=357
No HS diploma (25+)6.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (0.0–14.1%) n=360
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.6% (12.3–46.1%) n=360
Unemployment rate (16+)9.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.8% (0.0–10.2%) n=357
Households without a vehicle5.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–9.5%) n=360
Broadband subscription89.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.1–100.0%) n=360
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.3–37.2%) n=360
Homeownership rate87.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.0% (56.9–95.8%) n=360
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–6.6%) n=360
Foreign-born population3.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–4.9%) n=360
Single-parent households72.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.3% (39.9–84.5%) n=356
Population 65+21.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.0% (12.9–44.0%) n=360
Median age48.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.0 yr (32.9–62.3) n=358
Median household income$63,981$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,875 ($44,980–$95,192) n=321
Median home value$437,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$292,450 ($127,430–$548,550) n=312
Median gross rent$905$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$877 ($544–$1,329) n=213
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.0 yr ± 1.5978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.7 yr (76.7–83.7) n=358

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.59 years of 83.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured