Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

58788

in Towner, North DakotaPopulation 884

52.91/ 100

Ranked #12,209 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #256 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #26 of 32 Minot, ND ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Child-care access

1.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

243.7 mi

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.5 pCi/L

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.6%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST47th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

23.2 mi

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.3%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST55th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

9.9%

in the bottom 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

55.5%

in the top 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Towner, North Dakota (ZIP 58788), by its composite score, sits in the top 38% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,209th) and the bottom 31% of North Dakota (256th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: childcare settles in the top 0.4% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site sits in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the bottom 5.5% nationally, and loneliness rests in the bottom 7.3% nationally. Housing-cost burden resides in the bottom 9.3% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled radon is in the top 4.5% nationally, modeled fine-particle lands in the top 6.0% nationally, and distance to a community health center stands in the top 6.5% nationally. Slow internet speeds registers in the top 8.8% nationally, and modeled pfas settles in the top 10.2% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 58368, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Minot, ND metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.8%28.3–35.3
High blood pressure among adults39.3%35.1–43.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%9.7–11.9
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.6–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.3–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.4–9.1
Depression among adults19.0%16.1–22.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.4–13.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.3%34.0–42.6
Obesity among adults41.0%33.6–48.7
Stroke among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.0%8.9–13.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.8%6.3–9.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.5%78.7–84.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.5%73.9–81.1
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%84.6–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.5%60.5–70.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.6%59.8–67.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.1%70.5–84.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.2%15.2–21.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.4%11.9–17.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.2%21.7–30.8
Short sleep duration among adults31.9%25.8–38.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.3%15.5–21.4
Frequent mental distress among adults12.9%11.2–14.6
Frequent physical distress among adults13.4%11.6–15.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.0%10.2–13.7
Any disability among adults31.5%27.2–35.8
Hearing disability among adults10.1%8.9–11.3
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.5–8.7
Mobility disability among adults14.7%12.4–17.2
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.3–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.0–5.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.3%17.0–24.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.1–12.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.2%4.9–7.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.6–9.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.8–6.6
Loneliness among adults28.0%23.5–33.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.3–6.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380
Uninsured 18–6412.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380
No HS diploma (25+)7.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382
Unemployment rate (16+)6.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382
Households without a vehicle5.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379
Broadband subscription82.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)9.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32215.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379
Homeownership rate77.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379
Foreign-born population0.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383
Single-parent households45.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377
Population 65+31.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383
Median age51.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381
Median household income$80,595$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354
Median home value$123,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328
Median gross rent$450$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$767 ($513–$1,222) n=212
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.1 yr ± 1.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.65 years of 80.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured