ZIP code
58707
in Minot, North DakotaPopulation 500
60.93/ 100
Ranked #4,174 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 13.1%)
Ranked #22 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (top 6.0%)
Ranked #2 of 32 Minot, ND ZIPs (top 6.3%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
High cholesterol
11.9%
in the bottom 0.09% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
28.3%
in the top 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
9.5%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
1.3%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
0.70%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Stroke
0.40%
in the bottom 0.10% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
2.2%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
2.1%
in the bottom 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Distance to a Superfund site
291.7 mi
in the top 0.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
43.4%
in the top 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›The read
By the composite measure, ZIP 58707, one of several in Minot, North Dakota sits in the top 13.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,174th) and the top 6.0% of North Dakota (22nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.
Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: distance to a Superfund site settles in the top 0.5% nationally, modeled obesity stands in the bottom 2.2% nationally, and modeled fair or poor health is in the bottom 0.3% nationally. On the other hand, modeled binge drinking rests in the top 0.2% nationally, modeled loneliness sits in the top 1.1% nationally, and lead in tap water registers in the top 1.1% nationally. Slow internet speeds lands in the top 1.5% nationally, and unemployment resides in the top 1.6% nationally. Modeled fine-particle lies in the top 4.0% nationally, and tree cover settles at the national minimum.
Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. ZIP 58705, about 10.0 miles away, ranks healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Minot, ND metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.5%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 83%
14%
Disability
healthier than 99%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 83%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 77%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 58%
11%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 8%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 6%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 22%
8%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.8%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 96%
14%
Disability
in the top 0.2%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 96%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 55%
11%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 50%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 5%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 5%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 3%
8%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.00%
21%
Environmental Hazard
in the top 0.00%
14%
Risk Behavior
in the top 0.00%
11%
Disability
in the top 0.00%
7%
Healthcare Access
in the top 0.00%
5%
About typical
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 49%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
in the bottom 0.00%
16%
Preventive Care
in the bottom 0.00%
13%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.00%
8%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
58703
North Dakotashares a border
Score 59.70
Closest healthier
58705
North Dakotaabout 10.0 mi away
Score 65.10
Similar health profile
11549
New York99% similar profile
Score 64.26
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 4.6% | 3.8–5.5 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 9.5% | 7.9–11.3 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 1.0% | 0.8–1.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.8% | 9.4–12.5 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 0.7% | 0.6–0.8 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 1.3% | 0.9–1.8 |
| Depression among adults | 24.1% | 20.4–28.2 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 1.3% | 1.1–1.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 11.9% | 10.2–13.8 |
| Obesity among adults | 22.1% | 17.9–26.5 |
| Stroke among adults | 0.4% | 0.4–0.5 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 14.5% | 11.7–17.9 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 7.3% | 4.8–11.0 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 25.3% | 22.1–29.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 63.2% | 57.9–67.8 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 66.0% | 59.0–72.2 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 73.5% | 69.6–77.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 64.5% | 60.8–68.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 70.2% | 62.4–77.4 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 28.3% | 24.3–32.6 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 5.6% | 3.7–7.8 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 14.5% | 10.3–19.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 38.1% | 33.3–43.1 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 9.1% | 6.6–12.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 19.6% | 15.2–23.4 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 6.2% | 4.7–7.9 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 17.0% | 12.3–22.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 23.0% | 17.3–29.2 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 2.1% | 1.7–2.5 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.6% | 4.6–9.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 2.2% | 1.7–3.0 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 0.9% | 0.7–1.1 |
| Vision disability among adults | 2.5% | 1.9–3.3 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 23.9% | 19.0–29.3 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.6% | 7.2–15.9 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 4.4% | 2.8–6.8 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.4% | 6.1–11.2 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 8.4% | 6.2–11.2 |
| Loneliness among adults | 43.4% | 37.2–49.7 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 4.3% | 3.2–5.4 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | ND median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | — | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 8.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 5.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 70.8% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 24.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 22.4% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 1.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382 |
| Households without a vehicle | — | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 1.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379 |
| Broadband subscription | — | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | — | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 15.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379 |
| Homeownership rate | — | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 83.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | — | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379 |
| Foreign-born population | 22.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383 |
| Single-parent households | — | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 59.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377 |
| Population 65+ | 0.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 21.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383 |
| Median age | 19.9 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $767 ($513–$1,222) n=212 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | ND median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 81.8 yr ± 2.00 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.00 years of 81.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured