ZIP code
58711
in Antler, North DakotaPopulation 137
52.45/ 100
Ranked #12,840 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 40%)
Ranked #271 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (bottom 27%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Distance to a Superfund site
304.3 mi
in the top 0.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST97thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
25.7%
in the bottom 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST6thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
31.7 mi
in the top 1.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›Distance to an emergency room
30.7 mi
in the top 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Distance to a community health center
38.1 mi
in the top 2.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST84thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.
Full methodology ›Floodplain exposure
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›Radon
3.4 pCi/L
in the top 5.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST70thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.
Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.
Full methodology ›Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance
1.6%
in the top 5.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST51stUS94thDefinition & source ›
The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.
Full methodology ›Air-toxics cancer risk
18.6 per million
in the bottom 7.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST17thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.
Full methodology ›The read
Antler, North Dakota (ZIP 58711), overall, ranks in the top 40% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,840th) and the bottom 27% of North Dakota (271st).
This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: distance to a Superfund site lies in the top 0.4% nationally, modeled loneliness stands in the bottom 0.8% nationally, and modeled transportation noise rests at the national minimum. Floodplain exposure registers at the national minimum, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the bottom 7.0% nationally. Set against that, distance to a nursing home settles in the top 1.4% nationally, and distance to an emergency room is in the top 1.8% nationally. Distance to a community health center sits in the top 2.4% nationally, and modeled radon lands in the top 5.7% nationally. Modeled fine-particle lies in the top 5.6% nationally.
Defined simply, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. ZIP 58760, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 71%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 88%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 63%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 95%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 93%
5%
About typical
Disability
healthier than 48%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 22%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 33%
14%
Healthcare Access
in the bottom 0.2%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 61%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 94%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 66%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 90%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 91%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 52%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 12%
21%
Disability
healthier than 26%
7%
Healthcare Access
in the bottom 0.5%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
58760
North Dakotashares a border
Score 52.90
Closest healthier
58761
North Dakotashares a border
Score 54.03
Similar health profile
58646
North Dakota99% similar profile
Score 53.38
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 35.4% | 31.6–39.5 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 44.0% | 39.6–48.6 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 12.3% | 11.0–13.6 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.9% | 8.7–11.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 9.8% | 8.5–11.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 9.0% | 7.3–10.8 |
| Depression among adults | 18.7% | 15.8–22.1 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 14.2% | 12.1–16.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 43.3% | 38.9–48.1 |
| Obesity among adults | 39.1% | 31.9–47.2 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.6% | 4.0–5.2 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 9.7% | 7.8–11.9 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 6.5% | 4.7–8.8 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 83.8% | 81.1–86.3 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 79.2% | 75.6–82.6 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 88.2% | 86.2–90.1 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 73.4% | 68.7–77.9 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 67.3% | 63.7–70.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 77.2% | 69.6–83.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 16.9% | 14.0–20.4 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 14.6% | 11.5–18.1 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 26.3% | 21.2–31.9 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 31.5% | 25.7–38.1 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 19.2% | 15.8–23.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 12.3% | 10.5–14.2 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 13.9% | 11.9–16.4 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 11.5% | 9.6–13.6 |
| Any disability among adults | 32.1% | 27.3–37.6 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 11.2% | 9.8–12.8 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.6% | 6.3–8.9 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 15.7% | 13.0–18.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.2% | 3.5–5.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.9% | 4.2–5.8 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 19.6% | 16.2–23.1 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.9% | 7.6–12.6 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 6.4% | 4.8–8.4 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 7.2% | 5.7–8.9 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 5.5% | 4.5–6.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 25.7% | 21.4–30.4 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 4.9% | 4.0–5.9 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | ND median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 3.6% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 8.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 8.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 3.3% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 51.1% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 24.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 1.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 1.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379 |
| Broadband subscription | 96.7% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 16.7% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 15.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379 |
| Homeownership rate | 95.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 83.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379 |
| Foreign-born population | 5.1% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383 |
| Single-parent households | 40.8% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 59.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377 |
| Population 65+ | 16.8% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 21.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383 |
| Median age | 38.5 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381 |
| Median household income | $64,167 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354 |
| Median home value | $215,000 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $767 ($513–$1,222) n=212 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | ND median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 84.7 yr ± 3.22 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.22 years of 84.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured