Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

58421

in Carrington, North DakotaPopulation 2,969

54.19/ 100

Ranked #10,452 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #190 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.8 pCi/L

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

46.3 mi

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

33.1 mi

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

161.7 mi

in the top 1.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST43rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

92 µg/L

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.5%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.35 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST74th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Carrington, North Dakota (ZIP 58421), on the composite measure, lands in the top 33% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,452nd) and the bottom 49% of North Dakota (190th).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: distance to a Superfund site settles in the top 1.6% nationally, fatal road crashes stands at the national minimum, and pharmacy is in the top 2.4% nationally. Fiber broadband rests in the top 3.4% nationally, elder services sits in the top 3.8% nationally, and recreation registers in the top 4.2% nationally. Working the other way, modeled radon lands in the top 2.6% nationally, and distance to a community health center resides in the top 1.4% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lies in the top 1.5% nationally, and lithium in drinking water settles in the top 3.0% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, slow internet speeds runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 58443, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 1%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.7%27.1–34.2
High blood pressure among adults37.0%32.8–41.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.4–11.6
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.9–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.7–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.0–8.4
Depression among adults20.2%16.9–23.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.4%9.8–13.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.8%33.3–42.3
Obesity among adults36.1%28.3–44.1
Stroke among adults3.8%3.3–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.7%12.0–17.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.1–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.2%77.2–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.5%72.6–80.0
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.1–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.7%61.3–71.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.3%59.8–66.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.9%67.8–82.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.7%16.3–23.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.7%11.3–16.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.5%20.1–29.2
Short sleep duration among adults31.2%25.2–37.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.4%14.6–20.5
Frequent mental distress among adults13.4%11.6–15.2
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.1–14.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.0%10.4–13.9
Any disability among adults29.2%25.0–33.6
Hearing disability among adults9.4%8.2–10.6
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.4–8.7
Mobility disability among adults13.6%11.3–15.9
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.1–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.5%3.9–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.7%16.5–23.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.6–11.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.1%4.7–7.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.4–9.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.8–6.7
Loneliness among adults28.1%23.6–33.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.4–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380
Uninsured 18–647.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380
No HS diploma (25+)6.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382
Unemployment rate (16+)1.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382
Households without a vehicle8.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379
Broadband subscription92.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32215.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379
Homeownership rate78.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379
Foreign-born population2.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383
Single-parent households49.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377
Population 65+23.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383
Median age41.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381
Median household income$89,097$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354
Median home value$171,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328
Median gross rent$786$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$767 ($513–$1,222) n=212
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.3 yr ± 1.0578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.05 years of 80.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured