Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

57438

in Faulkton, South DakotaPopulation 973

44.38/ 100

Ranked #23,043 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #302 of 360 South Dakota ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Energy-cost burden

9.5%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

190.4 mi

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.7 pCi/L

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.71 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.71 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.2 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST29th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.0%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

26.7 mi

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.71 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.5%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST59th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

Faulkton, South Dakota (ZIP 57438), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 28% nationally (23,043rd) and the bottom 16% of South Dakota (302nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures that define this area's challenges come through directly: modeled energy burden resides in the top 0.5% nationally, and radon is in the top 3.1% nationally. Walkability lands in the bottom 3.4% nationally, and modeled hearing disability stands in the top 4.5% nationally. Distance to a community health center registers in the top 5.1% nationally. On the stronger side, distance to a Superfund site settles in the top 1.1% nationally, elder services sits in the top 1.5% nationally, and pharmacy lies in the top 2.3% nationally. Childcare rests in the top 5.1% nationally. Distance to an emergency room resides at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs.

For anyone unfamiliar, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 57345, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.4%29.6–37.3
High blood pressure among adults39.7%35.3–44.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.1%10.8–13.5
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.3–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults10.0%8.7–11.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.3–11.5
Depression among adults21.0%17.7–24.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.7%12.6–17.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.1%33.6–42.9
Obesity among adults36.0%27.9–44.8
Stroke among adults5.1%4.4–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.6%15.4–22.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.5%7.8–11.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.2%78.4–83.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.7%75.0–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%83.9–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.9%61.4–71.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.1%58.2–65.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.7%63.8–79.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%12.8–18.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.0%14.4–19.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.9%23.8–34.2
Short sleep duration among adults29.8%23.3–36.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.5%18.3–24.9
Frequent mental distress among adults15.3%13.5–17.3
Frequent physical distress among adults15.3%13.3–17.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.9%13.0–16.8
Any disability among adults37.2%32.4–42.2
Hearing disability among adults12.0%10.5–13.5
Independent living disability among adults10.1%8.6–11.6
Mobility disability among adults18.5%15.7–21.5
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.2–5.7
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.4–7.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (1.1–33.5%) n=364
Uninsured 18–6413.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.6% (0.0–33.2%) n=365
No HS diploma (25+)14.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.0% (0.8–15.3%) n=366
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (10.3–40.7%) n=366
Unemployment rate (16+)9.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–8.0%) n=365
Households without a vehicle16.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.9% (0.0–9.6%) n=364
Broadband subscription76.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (73.7–96.3%) n=364
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)8.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.5% (5.2–30.6%) n=364
Homeownership rate65.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.9% (57.2–94.8%) n=364
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.6% (0.0–10.2%) n=364
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–5.3%) n=367
Single-parent households55.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.7% (32.7–81.4%) n=362
Population 65+30.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.3% (8.4–33.0%) n=367
Median age43.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (27.6–56.7) n=365
Median household income$70,673$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$74,865 ($51,211–$102,582) n=336
Median home value$134,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($79,000–$321,400) n=311
Median gross rent$791$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$763 ($544–$1,089) n=243
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.8 yr ± 1.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.4–84.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.55 years of 81.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured