Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

57401

in Aberdeen, South DakotaPopulation 31,939

57.76/ 100

Ranked #6,600 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #51 of 360 South Dakota ZIPs (top 14.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 0.07% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.7 pCi/L

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

152.1 mi

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

431 units

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

68 µg/L

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.1%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.6%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST53rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

32.5%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

10.2%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Aberdeen, South Dakota (ZIP 57401) sits in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,600th) and the top 14.2% of South Dakota (51st).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: distance to a Superfund site registers in the top 1.8% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 5.4% nationally. Distance to an emergency room resides at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled short sleep lies in the bottom 7.9% nationally. Distance to a community health center settles at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Working the other way, modeled disaster risk stands in the top 0.07% nationally, and expected annual loss is in the top 0.4% nationally. Modeled radon rests in the top 3.2% nationally, and lithium in drinking water sits in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled fine-particle registers in the top 8.1% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. ZIP 57427, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 17.9; chronic-disease standing 75.4 — 58 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,159 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.3%24.8–29.9
High blood pressure among adults31.1%28.1–34.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.3–9.9
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.7–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.2%5.5–7.0
Depression among adults20.5%17.8–23.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.9%9.6–12.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.5%29.4–35.8
Obesity among adults35.0%30.4–39.9
Stroke among adults3.3%3.0–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.9%9.9–14.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.5%7.2–9.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.3%74.5–79.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.8%74.7–80.7
Cholesterol screening among adults84.2%82.3–86.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.0%63.2–70.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.0%66.2–71.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.3%74.1–84.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.5–19.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.2%12.3–16.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.6%21.4–28.1
Short sleep duration among adults29.6%26.0–33.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.5%14.5–18.6
Frequent mental distress among adults15.2%13.5–17.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.1%10.7–13.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%11.9–15.0
Any disability among adults30.7%27.4–34.2
Hearing disability among adults8.1%7.3–9.1
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.7–8.4
Mobility disability among adults12.8%11.3–14.5
Self-care disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.6
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (1.1–33.5%) n=364
Uninsured 18–648.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.6% (0.0–33.2%) n=365
No HS diploma (25+)6.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.0% (0.8–15.3%) n=366
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (10.3–40.7%) n=366
Unemployment rate (16+)3.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–8.0%) n=365
Households without a vehicle7.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.9% (0.0–9.6%) n=364
Broadband subscription87.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (73.7–96.3%) n=364
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.5% (5.2–30.6%) n=364
Homeownership rate64.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.9% (57.2–94.8%) n=364
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.6% (0.0–10.2%) n=364
Foreign-born population4.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–5.3%) n=367
Single-parent households50.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.7% (32.7–81.4%) n=362
Population 65+17.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.3% (8.4–33.0%) n=367
Median age37.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (27.6–56.7) n=365
Median household income$68,835$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$74,865 ($51,211–$102,582) n=336
Median home value$226,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($79,000–$321,400) n=311
Median gross rent$766$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$763 ($544–$1,089) n=243
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.6 yr ± 0.6278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.4–84.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.62 years of 79.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured