Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

10914

in Blooming Grove, New YorkPopulation 1,205

59.89/ 100

Ranked #4,939 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 15%)

Ranked #617 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranked #60 of 77 Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$160,132

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.6%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.8%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

1.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

28.8%

in the bottom 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Blooming Grove, New York (ZIP 10914) sits in the top 15% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,939th) and the top 36% of New York (617th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: household income sits in the top 2.9% nationally, fatal road crashes registers at the national minimum, and modeled transportation noise lands at the national minimum. Poverty resides at the national minimum, homeownership lies at the national maximum, and home broadband subscription settles at the national maximum. Modeled hearing disability stands in the bottom 4.0% nationally. Households without a vehicle is at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled extreme heat rests at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. On the other hand, fiber broadband sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. ZIP 10916, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall. This ZIP also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.8%20.1–25.7
High blood pressure among adults28.8%25.6–32.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.0%6.2–7.8
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults4.8%4.2–5.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%4.6–7.2
Depression among adults19.5%16.7–22.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.7%8.4–11.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.2%29.7–37.0
Obesity among adults31.2%26.1–36.7
Stroke among adults2.7%2.3–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.3%4.9–7.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.2%5.6–9.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.4%70.1–76.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.1%74.6–81.1
Cholesterol screening among adults87.6%85.5–89.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.9%63.1–72.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.8%63.5–69.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.6%65.7–80.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%13.8–19.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.4%9.8–15.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.6%19.5–28.2
Short sleep duration among adults37.1%31.9–42.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.6%13.8–19.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%14.7–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.8%10.9–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.0%10.8–15.2
Any disability among adults25.0%21.0–29.3
Hearing disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.3
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.0–8.6
Mobility disability among adults11.0%8.9–13.3
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.8–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.7–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.2%20.5–28.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.2%11.2–17.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.6%8.9–14.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.2%11.0–15.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.7–9.5
Loneliness among adults32.0%27.4–36.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.2–8.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–646.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)39.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)5.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population31.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households27.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+7.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age26.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$160,132$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$451,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.8 yr ± 3.0678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.06 years of 83.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured