Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

56729

in Halma, MinnesotaPopulation 121

51.79/ 100

Ranked #13,716 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #577 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Energy-cost burden

6.7%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

124 mi

in the top 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

36.5 mi

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.07%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.4%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

12.4 days/year

in the bottom 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US9th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

3.3%

in the bottom 11.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

47.3%

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Halma, Minnesota (ZIP 56729) ranks in the top 43% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,716th) and the bottom 33% of Minnesota (577th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: distance to a Superfund site resides in the top 2.6% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the bottom 5.7% nationally. Floodplain exposure rests in the bottom 7.3% nationally. Households without a vehicle stands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat lies in the bottom 9.3% nationally, and expected annual loss lands in the bottom 9.5% nationally. On the other side, modeled energy burden sits in the top 1.5% nationally, distance to a community health center is in the top 2.7% nationally, and slow internet speeds settles in the top 8.1% nationally. Walkability resides in the bottom 10.2% nationally.

To spell things out, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Close by, ZIP 56732, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.7%24.4–31.2
High blood pressure among adults37.6%33.2–42.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.9%9.8–12.1
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.5–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.5–9.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%5.9–8.6
Depression among adults22.7%19.3–26.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.6%10.8–14.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.0%32.7–41.4
Obesity among adults34.7%26.8–43.0
Stroke among adults4.2%3.6–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.2%6.6–10.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.3%5.7–9.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.3%77.4–83.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.3%72.3–80.0
Cholesterol screening among adults86.2%84.1–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.9%62.9–72.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.9%61.4–68.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.3%69.8–83.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.6%14.5–21.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.3%12.4–18.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.3%21.5–31.5
Short sleep duration among adults30.7%24.8–37.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.4%15.4–21.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.7%12.7–16.6
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%11.3–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.2%11.3–15.2
Any disability among adults31.9%27.4–36.6
Hearing disability among adults9.9%8.7–11.2
Independent living disability among adults8.0%6.8–9.3
Mobility disability among adults14.6%12.2–17.2
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.3–4.5
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.1–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.7%17.1–24.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.8%8.5–13.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.1–9.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.2%6.6–9.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.7–7.9
Loneliness among adults28.8%23.9–33.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.5–6.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–641.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)5.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)3.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription91.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate80.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population1.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households33.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+10.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age34.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$78,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$158,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$658$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.0 yr ± 1.5478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.54 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured