Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

56673

in Roosevelt, MinnesotaPopulation 642

52.85/ 100

Ranked #12,306 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #505 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

1.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

63.1 mi

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

6.2%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.4 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

88.4 mi

in the top 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

21 mi

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.6%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

7.9%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Roosevelt, Minnesota (ZIP 56673), in overall standing, comes out in the top 38% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,306th) and the bottom 42% of Minnesota (505th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: grocery resides in the top 0.2% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the bottom 0.7% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk stands in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site resides in the top 4.4% nationally. On the other hand, distance to a community health center sits in the top 0.5% nationally, and modeled energy burden stands in the top 2.4% nationally. Walkability resides in the bottom 4.2% nationally, and distance to an emergency room sits in the top 4.9% nationally. Modeled fine-particle stands in the top 6.1% nationally, and crowded housing resides in the top 6.9% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, grocery runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 56711, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.9%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.4%24.9–29.9
High blood pressure among adults33.8%30.7–36.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.4–11.0
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.4–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.5–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.2–8.0
Depression among adults23.7%21.1–26.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.8%10.5–13.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.4%33.2–39.6
Obesity among adults36.2%30.6–41.7
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.9%8.4–11.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.9%5.7–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.8%77.4–81.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.1%73.1–78.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.7%85.1–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.9%68.1–75.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.2%62.2–68.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.2%73.9–83.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.1%15.7–20.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%13.6–17.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.0%21.7–28.5
Short sleep duration among adults30.8%26.1–35.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.5%15.5–19.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.2%13.8–16.7
Frequent physical distress among adults13.3%11.9–14.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%12.0–14.9
Any disability among adults30.6%27.4–34.0
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.4–9.0
Independent living disability among adults7.7%6.9–8.6
Mobility disability among adults14.0%12.3–15.7
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.4%18.7–24.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.8%8.9–12.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.4–9.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.3–9.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.7–7.4
Loneliness among adults29.0%25.4–32.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.7–6.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)7.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription96.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate94.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households43.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+16.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age41.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$68,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$124,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth86.2 yr ± 1.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.96 years of 86.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured