Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

56759

in Strathcona, MinnesotaPopulation 421

53.80/ 100

Ranked #10,962 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #425 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a community health center

49.8 mi

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

97.1 mi

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.7%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

13.3%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.7%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

16.9 per million

in the bottom 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

95.5%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

11.4 days/year

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

Strathcona, Minnesota (ZIP 56759), overall, ranks in the top 34% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,962nd) and the top 49% of Minnesota (425th).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: floodplain exposure lands at the national minimum, distance to a Superfund site lies in the top 3.8% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk stands in the bottom 6.4% nationally. Homeownership rests in the top 8.0% nationally, and modeled humid heat registers in the bottom 8.3% nationally. Set against that, distance to a community health center resides in the top 1.2% nationally, and modeled energy burden settles in the top 4.0% nationally. Unemployment is in the top 5.1% nationally, and modeled fine-particle sits in the top 5.3% nationally. Walkability lands in the bottom 7.5% nationally.

Defined simply, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. ZIP 56733, about 17 miles away, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 1%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.9%23.5–28.6
High blood pressure among adults33.1%30.0–36.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.1–10.8
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.8–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.3–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.4%5.5–7.4
Depression among adults22.6%20.0–25.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.1%9.7–12.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.5%32.2–39.1
Obesity among adults36.0%30.5–41.8
Stroke among adults3.5%3.1–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.0%12.8–17.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.9%5.6–8.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%76.6–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.5%72.5–78.4
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.4–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.2%66.3–73.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.6%64.6–70.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.1%71.3–82.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.3%16.8–22.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.8%12.5–17.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.7%20.0–27.6
Short sleep duration among adults30.5%25.8–35.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.6%14.2–19.0
Frequent mental distress among adults14.8%13.3–16.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.5%11.0–14.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.9%11.4–14.6
Any disability among adults29.6%26.1–33.4
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.1
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.3–8.2
Mobility disability among adults12.9%11.0–14.9
Self-care disability among adults3.4%2.9–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.4%18.7–24.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.2–11.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.5–8.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.6–9.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.4–7.0
Loneliness among adults29.0%25.3–32.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.3–5.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–647.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)6.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)13.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle1.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription92.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate95.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population2.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households70.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+15.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age43.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$75,625$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$191,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.2 yr ± 1.3278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.32 years of 80.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured