Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

56523

in Climax, MinnesotaPopulation 382

55.28/ 100

Ranked #9,111 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranked #315 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranked #12 of 31 Grand Forks, ND-MN ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

38.7%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.7%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.4 pCi/L

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

85.8 mi

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.3%

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.3 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 9.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.9%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$56,685

in the bottom 24% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US24th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

14.1 days/year

in the top 29% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US71st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

On the composite measure, Climax, Minnesota (ZIP 56523) stands in the top 28% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,111th) and the top 36% of Minnesota (315th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: fiber broadband rests at the national maximum, and distance to a Superfund site lands in the top 4.6% nationally. Modeled loneliness settles in the bottom 9.0% nationally, and colon screening rests in the top 7.6% nationally. Modeled mammography lands in the top 10.6% nationally, and housing insecurity settles in the bottom 13.3% nationally. Working the other way, modeled arsenic rests in the top 1.8% nationally, fine-particle lands in the top 2.7% nationally, and radon settles in the top 5.9% nationally. Walkability rests in the bottom 9.3% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, arsenic runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. ZIP 56568, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Grand Forks, ND-MN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 79%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 57%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

in the top 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.8%23.6–30.1
High blood pressure among adults33.1%29.3–37.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.5–11.5
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.7–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.4–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.2%5.3–7.3
Depression among adults23.6%20.3–27.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.2%9.6–13.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.8%30.8–38.9
Obesity among adults38.7%32.0–45.8
Stroke among adults3.5%3.1–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.1%6.5–10.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.4%5.1–7.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.7%76.7–82.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.4%73.0–79.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.9%86.2–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.9%68.5–77.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.8%67.7–73.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.1%73.6–85.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.5%15.5–21.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.2%11.7–16.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.2%19.3–27.7
Short sleep duration among adults32.2%27.0–38.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.1%13.6–18.8
Frequent mental distress among adults14.1%12.4–16.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.3%10.7–14.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.9%10.3–13.6
Any disability among adults27.3%23.5–31.6
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.4
Independent living disability among adults6.7%5.8–7.7
Mobility disability among adults12.4%10.5–14.5
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.8
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.4%17.2–23.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.4–11.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.1–8.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.3–9.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.0–6.9
Loneliness among adults28.3%23.9–33.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.1–5.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–647.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)4.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)3.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription83.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate80.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population2.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households58.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+22.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age39.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$56,685$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$147,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$950$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.9 yr ± 2.1878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.18 years of 84.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured