Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14872

in Pine Valley, New YorkPopulation 589

58.84/ 100

Ranked #5,713 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #704 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranked #5 of 15 Elmira, NY ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transportation noise

11.3%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

73.1%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97.8%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US8th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.9%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Pine Valley, New York (ZIP 14872) comes out in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,713th) and the top 41% of New York (704th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several good marks anchor the profile and deserve first mention: modeled tree cover stands in the top 7.7% nationally, home broadband subscription lands in the top 7.9% nationally, and modeled disaster risk is in the bottom 8.2% nationally. Modeled extreme heat resides at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss rests in the bottom 10.2% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lies at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled obesity sits in the bottom 13.0% nationally, and mammography settles in the top 10.6% nationally. By contrast, modeled transportation noise registers in the top 7.0% nationally. Fiber broadband stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 14845, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.9%23.8–30.2
High blood pressure among adults33.9%30.0–37.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.7–10.6
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.6–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%5.7–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%5.7–8.0
Depression among adults21.3%18.2–24.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.7%8.2–11.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.9%32.9–41.1
Obesity among adults28.6%22.6–35.3
Stroke among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.7%8.7–13.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.9%3.7–6.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.7%74.8–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%77.5–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults89.6%87.9–91.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.4%67.0–75.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.9%61.4–68.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.1%73.5–85.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%14.6–20.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.8%10.1–15.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.1%18.0–26.7
Short sleep duration among adults33.9%28.0–40.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.4%12.9–18.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.2–18.6
Frequent physical distress among adults13.0%11.1–14.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.0%10.2–14.0
Any disability among adults25.7%21.7–30.0
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.5–7.3
Independent living disability among adults7.2%6.1–8.4
Mobility disability among adults12.0%10.0–14.2
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.8–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.4–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.7%18.7–27.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%8.3–13.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.6%7.4–12.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%7.8–11.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.3–7.6
Loneliness among adults31.8%26.1–37.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.0%4.9–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–644.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)4.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)2.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle2.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription97.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate60.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population0.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households31.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+23.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age37.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$62,708$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$790$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.5 yr ± 1.3578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.35 years of 81.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured