Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

56270

in Morton, MinnesotaPopulation 1,076

44.36/ 100

Ranked #23,058 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #834 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (bottom 3.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Energy-cost burden

8.2%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

33.1 mi

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

26.8%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.2 pCi/L

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

37.2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.84 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

33.1%

in the bottom 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

11.2%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

14.1%

in the top 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US76th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

18.6%

in the top 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US75th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Morton, Minnesota (ZIP 56270) ranks in the bottom 28% nationally (23,058th) and the bottom 3.7% of Minnesota (834th).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: dental providers resides in the top 10.0% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site stands in the top 13.2% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol sits in the bottom 9.8% nationally. Working the other way, modeled energy burden resides in the top 0.6% nationally, distance to a community health center stands in the top 3.4% nationally, and modeled arsenic sits in the top 4.0% nationally. Modeled radon resides in the top 8.2% nationally, and fine-particle stands in the top 12.9% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation resides in the top 17% nationally.

For context, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 55310, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.7%21.7–25.8
High blood pressure among adults32.4%29.7–35.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.7%7.2–8.4
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.6–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.2–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%6.0–7.6
Depression among adults24.5%22.1–27.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.8%11.6–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.1%30.4–35.9
Obesity among adults39.6%34.5–44.9
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.4%10.7–14.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.4%8.0–11.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.8%73.4–77.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.4%70.5–76.2
Cholesterol screening among adults82.4%80.7–84.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.2%63.6–70.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.0%57.3–62.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.9%67.1–78.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.2%15.9–20.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.4%17.3–21.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.0%23.9–30.3
Short sleep duration among adults31.8%27.7–36.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.8%18.8–23.0
Frequent mental distress among adults18.0%16.6–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.2%13.0–15.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.2%14.7–17.7
Any disability among adults33.3%30.2–36.6
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.5–9.0
Independent living disability among adults9.1%8.3–10.0
Mobility disability among adults14.2%12.7–15.8
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.2–6.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.0%22.1–28.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.6%16.1–21.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.0%11.0–15.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.1%12.3–15.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.9–12.5
Loneliness among adults34.5%30.7–38.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.8–10.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–6416.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)7.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle4.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription87.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate86.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households53.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+20.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age40.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$61,944$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$104,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$900$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.6 yr ± 0.9078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.90 years of 79.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured