Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

56229

in Cottonwood, MinnesotaPopulation 1,672

55.84/ 100

Ranked #8,469 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #277 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.5 pCi/L

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

81.1 mi

in the top 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.4%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST59th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.3%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.57 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.5%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

23.9 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US79th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

29.9 days/year

in the bottom 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US28th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

14.7 days/year

in the top 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US72nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Cottonwood, Minnesota (ZIP 56229) ranks in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,469th) and the top 32% of Minnesota (277th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: distance to a Superfund site lands in the top 5.0% nationally, and recreation sits in the top 6.7% nationally. Modeled short sleep is in the bottom 6.8% nationally, and childcare settles in the top 8.1% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the bottom 14.5% nationally. On the other side, modeled radon registers in the top 4.6% nationally, fine-particle rests in the top 7.4% nationally, and binge drinking stands in the top 8.3% nationally. Fiber broadband lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled arsenic lands in the top 14.4% nationally.

To spell things out, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Close by, ZIP 56239, about 2.0 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 22.6; chronic-disease standing 73.2 — 51 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,444 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.6%21.9–27.5
High blood pressure among adults32.0%28.5–35.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.2–9.9
Current asthma among adults10.1%9.0–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.8–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.1%5.2–7.1
Depression among adults23.6%20.4–27.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.6%9.2–12.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.3%29.5–37.2
Obesity among adults38.4%31.8–45.3
Stroke among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.3%10.1–14.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.1%5.8–8.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.6%74.7–80.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.1%71.4–78.4
Cholesterol screening among adults85.3%83.3–87.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.0%63.6–72.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.1%66.0–72.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.5%71.7–84.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.5%16.4–22.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.0%12.6–17.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.4%19.5–27.5
Short sleep duration among adults29.3%24.2–35.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.4%14.0–19.2
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%13.7–17.5
Frequent physical distress among adults12.1%10.6–13.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.2%11.4–15.0
Any disability among adults28.1%24.3–32.2
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.7–8.4
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.3–8.3
Mobility disability among adults12.0%10.2–14.0
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.8%17.8–24.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.5–12.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.0–9.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.1–10.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.8–7.7
Loneliness among adults29.5%25.3–34.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.7–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–645.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)3.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)5.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription89.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate83.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population2.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households60.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+19.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age41.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$104,375$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$205,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$756$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 0.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.96 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured