Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

56653

in Littlefork, MinnesotaPopulation 1,239

55.86/ 100

Ranked #8,438 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #276 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.83 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

48.4 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.5 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

7.8 days/year

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.4%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.2%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST57th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

16.5 mi

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

58.1 mi

in the top 9.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST81st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.4%

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Littlefork, Minnesota (ZIP 56653) ranks in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,438th) and the top 32% of Minnesota (276th).

continue reading

The measures that set this area apart are worth putting up front: modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and outpatient sits in the top 2.9% nationally. Modeled humid heat is in the bottom 5.0% nationally, and short sleep settles in the bottom 4.0% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site resides in the top 9.2% nationally, and modeled loneliness registers in the bottom 9.6% nationally. Set against that, fatal road crashes rests in the top 4.3% nationally, walkability stands in the bottom 4.7% nationally, and modeled fine-particle lies in the top 7.7% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lands in the top 9.0% nationally.

To spell things out, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. This ZIP stands out as the strongest overall among its immediate neighbors.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 99%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 92.1 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 41.1 — 51 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,415 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.9%26.5–33.6
High blood pressure among adults39.4%35.1–43.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.8%10.7–12.9
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.8–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%7.8–9.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.4%6.4–8.6
Depression among adults22.8%19.3–26.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.2%11.3–15.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.0%33.7–42.4
Obesity among adults36.2%28.9–43.8
Stroke among adults4.3%3.8–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.5%10.2–15.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%5.3–7.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.0%79.2–84.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%74.7–81.4
Cholesterol screening among adults88.2%86.7–89.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.6%66.8–76.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.3%66.1–72.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.1%71.9–85.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.4–19.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.8%12.6–17.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.6%22.1–31.1
Short sleep duration among adults28.4%22.8–34.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.9%15.3–20.5
Frequent mental distress among adults14.0%12.3–15.8
Frequent physical distress among adults13.5%11.8–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.5%10.9–14.1
Any disability among adults31.9%27.5–36.1
Hearing disability among adults9.9%8.7–11.0
Independent living disability among adults7.7%6.7–8.7
Mobility disability among adults15.0%12.8–17.2
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.8%16.8–23.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.2–11.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.1%5.9–8.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.3–8.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.4–7.1
Loneliness among adults28.4%23.7–33.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.9%4.2–5.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–6410.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)2.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)2.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle3.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription81.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate81.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population2.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households64.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+26.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age54.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$74,583$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$168,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$657$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.8 yr ± 1.2678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.26 years of 80.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured