Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

56081

in St. James, MinnesotaPopulation 6,172

49.10/ 100

Ranked #17,511 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranked #747 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (bottom 13.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

38.5%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.6 pCi/L

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.16 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

19.7 mi

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST53rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.16 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

10.6%

in the top 13.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

14.8%

in the top 11.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

30.1 days/year

in the bottom 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US28th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

9.4%

in the top 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US72nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

17.5%

in the top 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US72nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

In its overall standing, St. James, Minnesota (ZIP 56081) lands in the bottom 45% nationally (17,511th) and the bottom 13.8% of Minnesota (747th).

continue reading

Reading across the data, the real pressures come first: modeled arsenic is in the top 1.8% nationally, modeled radon sits in the top 4.2% nationally, and distance to a community health center lands in the top 8.4% nationally. Modeled fine-particle lies in the top 12.9% nationally, and households without a vehicle stands in the top 13.5% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. More encouragingly, mental-health providers registers in the top 5.9% nationally, and grocery resides in the top 10.2% nationally. Distance to a nursing home settles at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas is in the bottom 16% nationally.

Put simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. On the overall standing, ZIP 56019, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.4%22.4–28.6
High blood pressure among adults34.3%30.4–38.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.0–9.7
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.6–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.8–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.1–8.3
Depression among adults22.9%19.5–26.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.3–15.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.9%30.8–39.0
Obesity among adults37.9%30.2–45.9
Stroke among adults4.0%3.5–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.2%11.6–17.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.8%12.1–17.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.4%75.6–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.1%71.4–78.6
Cholesterol screening among adults83.8%81.6–85.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.9%60.9–70.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.0%57.4–64.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.9%68.3–82.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.8%13.9–19.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%13.4–18.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.8%26.1–36.0
Short sleep duration among adults31.5%25.6–38.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.1%19.1–25.6
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%13.8–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults14.3%12.6–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.1%13.2–17.3
Any disability among adults34.1%29.7–38.9
Hearing disability among adults8.9%7.9–10.0
Independent living disability among adults8.9%7.8–10.3
Mobility disability among adults15.7%13.6–18.2
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.9–5.0
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%19.3–26.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.5%14.5–20.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.0%9.8–14.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.2%11.1–15.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.1–10.7
Loneliness among adults30.0%25.4–35.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.6–8.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–6415.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)13.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)6.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle10.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription85.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate72.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population15.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households58.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+18.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age41.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$67,337$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$163,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$844$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.8 yr ± 0.8978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.89 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured