Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55957

in Millville, MinnesotaPopulation 748

57.58/ 100

Ranked #6,736 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #196 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #14 of 34 Rochester, MN ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

6.9%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.2 pCi/L

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.11%

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.6%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.8%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

7.0%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.61%

in the top 14.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

0.23%

in the bottom 21% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US21st
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Millville, Minnesota (ZIP 55957) lands in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,736th) and the top 23% of Minnesota (196th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

This area's most favorable readings come through plainly in the numbers: modeled pfas rests in the bottom 3.2% nationally, transportation noise registers in the bottom 8.5% nationally, and colon screening resides in the top 7.9% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise settles at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled tooth loss is in the bottom 8.3% nationally, and high blood pressure sits in the bottom 10.4% nationally. Modeled loneliness lands in the bottom 14.1% nationally. On the other side, modeled radon lies in the top 8.1% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden stands in the top 6.2% nationally. Modeled binge drinking rests in the top 7.9% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. On the overall standing, ZIP 55041, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Rochester, MN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 59%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.1%22.1–28.4
High blood pressure among adults29.8%26.1–33.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.2–10.0
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.2–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.2–6.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%5.0–6.9
Depression among adults24.2%20.7–28.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%8.7–11.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.4%29.4–37.6
Obesity among adults37.7%30.5–45.5
Stroke among adults3.1%2.7–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.0%5.5–8.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.4%5.2–7.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.6%74.6–80.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.1%71.3–78.8
Cholesterol screening among adults85.7%83.7–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.8%68.3–77.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.4%64.9–71.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.5%71.4–84.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.6%16.4–23.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.2%11.8–17.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.2%18.3–26.6
Short sleep duration among adults31.9%25.9–38.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.6%13.3–18.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.8%13.9–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults12.0%10.4–13.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.9%11.2–14.8
Any disability among adults26.3%22.5–30.7
Hearing disability among adults6.7%5.9–7.5
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.1–8.1
Mobility disability among adults11.5%9.8–13.7
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.7–3.6
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.0%16.8–23.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%7.8–11.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.6–8.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.6–9.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.3–7.2
Loneliness among adults29.0%24.1–33.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.3–6.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–642.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)6.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)1.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle0.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription88.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate81.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households59.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+19.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age37.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$76,094$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$265,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$833$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.3 yr ± 1.5678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.56 years of 84.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured