Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55918

in Brownsdale, MinnesotaPopulation 1,084

55.41/ 100

Ranked #8,972 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranked #309 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

23.6 mi

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

25.1 mi

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST63rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.8%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

31.2%

in the top 26% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US74th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Brownsdale, Minnesota (ZIP 55918), in overall standing, comes out in the top 28% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,972nd) and the top 36% of Minnesota (309th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: fatal road crashes sits at the national minimum, recreation stands in the top 8.0% nationally, and modeled colon screening resides in the top 7.9% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise sits at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled high cholesterol stands in the bottom 10.6% nationally, and loneliness resides in the bottom 16% nationally. On the other hand, distance to an emergency room sits in the top 3.6% nationally, and distance to a community health center stands in the top 5.7% nationally. Modeled radon resides in the top 12.1% nationally, and fine-particle sits in the top 11.7% nationally.

Defined simply, for reference, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 55926, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.5%22.5–28.5
High blood pressure among adults32.3%28.7–35.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.4–10.2
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.2–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.5–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.2%5.4–7.2
Depression among adults25.8%22.4–29.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.9%9.3–12.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.3%29.7–37.2
Obesity among adults38.0%32.0–44.4
Stroke among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.8%7.1–10.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.4%6.1–9.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.5%74.6–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.9%71.4–78.4
Cholesterol screening among adults85.7%83.9–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.8%68.0–76.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.2%63.7–70.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.2%72.3–85.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.2%15.3–21.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.1%12.7–17.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.6%20.6–28.6
Short sleep duration among adults32.0%26.3–38.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.0%13.8–18.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%13.9–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults12.3%10.8–13.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.3%11.6–15.1
Any disability among adults28.1%24.3–31.8
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.4–8.1
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.4–8.3
Mobility disability among adults12.1%10.4–14.0
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.3%18.1–24.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%8.9–13.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.1–9.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.4–10.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.8–7.8
Loneliness among adults29.2%24.9–33.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.7–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–645.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)4.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)2.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle1.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription89.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate88.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population1.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households52.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+21.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age43.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$78,523$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$163,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$813$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.5 yr ± 1.3678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.36 years of 83.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured