Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

56356

in New Munich, MinnesotaPopulation 266

55.81/ 100

Ranked #8,504 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranked #280 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #14 of 32 St. Cloud, MN ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

38 mi

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

72.5%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.6%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

95.7%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.3%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.9%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

29.1%

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

New Munich, Minnesota (ZIP 56356), by its composite score, sits in the top 27% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,504th) and the top 32% of Minnesota (280th).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: fiber broadband is at the national maximum, and modeled disaster risk lands in the bottom 2.2% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss stands in the bottom 7.3% nationally, and homeownership registers in the top 7.7% nationally. Modeled colon screening settles in the top 7.6% nationally, and high blood pressure sits in the bottom 8.5% nationally. On the other side, distance to a community health center lies in the top 2.5% nationally, modeled pfas rests in the top 3.8% nationally, and modeled fine-particle resides in the top 5.6% nationally. Modeled binge drinking is in the top 9.3% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 56331, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the St. Cloud, MN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 45%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.4%20.0–24.9
High blood pressure among adults29.1%26.0–32.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.1–10.1
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.0%5.2–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.6%4.5–6.6
Depression among adults26.0%22.7–29.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.0%7.5–10.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.4%29.3–35.7
Obesity among adults34.9%30.1–39.8
Stroke among adults3.1%2.7–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.0%7.2–11.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.9%5.3–9.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.8%72.7–78.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.1%70.8–77.4
Cholesterol screening among adults84.3%82.0–86.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.9%68.9–76.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.2%63.0–69.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.9%72.9–84.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.3%16.6–22.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.3%11.3–17.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.4%18.1–26.2
Short sleep duration among adults30.4%26.4–34.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.3%12.5–17.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.3–18.6
Frequent physical distress among adults11.7%9.9–13.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.7%11.5–15.8
Any disability among adults26.9%22.8–30.5
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.3–8.2
Independent living disability among adults7.4%6.2–8.7
Mobility disability among adults11.2%9.1–13.1
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.6–3.6
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.2–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.5%18.2–24.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.0–13.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.7%5.7–10.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.1–11.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.3–7.7
Loneliness among adults30.7%26.6–34.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.4–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–642.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)7.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)0.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle2.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription92.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate95.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households52.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+25.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age38.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$85,000$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$178,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$1,188$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth91.1 yr ± 3.8278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.82 years of 91.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured