Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55953

in Lyle, MinnesotaPopulation 901

53.96/ 100

Ranked #10,757 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #408 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Civic-institution access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.2 pCi/L

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

24.4 mi

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

17.1 mi

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.56%

in the top 14.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

13.7%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Lyle, Minnesota (ZIP 55953) lands in the top 34% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,757th) and the top 47% of Minnesota (408th).

continue reading

The measures that set this area apart are worth putting up front: civic resides in the top 3.3% nationally, and modeled loneliness registers in the bottom 12.4% nationally. Modeled pfas rests in the bottom 14.8% nationally, and housing-cost burden stands in the bottom 16% nationally. Modeled humid heat lies in the bottom 18% nationally. Set against that, modeled radon lands in the top 8.1% nationally, distance to a community health center sits in the top 5.9% nationally, and distance to an emergency room is in the top 8.2% nationally. Modeled fine-particle settles in the top 14.4% nationally. Recreation resides at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

A note on the terms: radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 50472, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.1%23.2–29.1
High blood pressure among adults33.9%30.4–37.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.8–10.6
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.9–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.6–7.5
Depression among adults25.0%21.8–28.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.4%9.9–13.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.0%30.4–37.8
Obesity among adults37.9%32.0–44.2
Stroke among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.7%7.7–11.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.3%6.0–8.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.2%75.3–81.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.3%71.9–78.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.0%84.1–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.2%64.5–73.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.6%63.2–69.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.0%72.3–84.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.7%15.0–21.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.6%12.9–18.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.4%21.3–29.7
Short sleep duration among adults32.2%26.5–38.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.6%14.1–19.3
Frequent mental distress among adults15.4%13.6–17.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.5%10.9–14.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.2%11.5–15.3
Any disability among adults29.0%25.1–33.2
Hearing disability among adults8.1%7.2–9.0
Independent living disability among adults7.4%6.5–8.5
Mobility disability among adults12.7%10.8–14.6
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.1–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.7–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.4%18.2–24.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%8.9–13.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.3–9.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.3–10.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.7–7.7
Loneliness among adults28.8%24.5–33.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.7–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–648.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)3.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)3.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle6.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription88.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate81.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households52.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+21.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age41.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$72,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$166,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$604$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.9 yr ± 0.9878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.98 years of 81.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured