Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55417

in Minneapolis, MinnesotaPopulation 25,102

64.67/ 100

Ranked #2,134 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 6.7%)

Ranked #51 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 5.9%)

Ranked #46 of 224 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transportation noise

57.2%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

26.3%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.7%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

7.2%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

8.4%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

26.4%

in the bottom 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

4.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

27.2%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 55417, one of several in Minneapolis, Minnesota lands in the top 6.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,134th) and the top 5.9% of Minnesota (51st).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: modeled short sleep lies in the bottom 0.9% nationally, and fiber broadband lands in the top 2.7% nationally. Modeled diabetes sits in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Distance to an emergency room is at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled mobility disability settles in the bottom 4.0% nationally, modeled obesity resides in the bottom 8.0% nationally, and transit registers in the top 6.3% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure rests in the bottom 4.9% nationally. Set against that, modeled transportation noise stands in the top 0.4% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water lies at the national maximum.

Set beside the nearby areas, transportation noise runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 55419, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 5.6 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 95.5 (top 10%) — 90 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,865 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults18.3%16.9–19.8
High blood pressure among adults27.2%25.4–29.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.1%7.4–8.8
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.6–10.5
Coronary heart disease among adults4.7%4.2–5.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
Depression among adults26.0%24.0–28.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults7.2%6.5–8.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.3%30.3–34.4
Obesity among adults26.4%24.1–29.0
Stroke among adults2.5%2.3–2.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.4%5.4–7.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.7–7.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.1%69.4–74.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.6%72.4–76.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.6%86.3–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.9%67.6–72.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.7%69.8–73.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.6%75.2–81.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.6%17.7–21.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.1%8.9–11.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.3%14.7–18.0
Short sleep duration among adults26.3%24.3–28.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.7%11.4–14.0
Frequent mental distress among adults13.7%12.4–15.0
Frequent physical distress among adults9.1%8.2–10.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.2%10.1–12.4
Any disability among adults22.6%20.8–24.6
Hearing disability among adults5.4%4.9–6.0
Independent living disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.1
Mobility disability among adults8.4%7.6–9.4
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.2–2.7
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.7%17.9–21.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.7–10.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.0–6.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.2–9.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Loneliness among adults31.1%28.8–33.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–643.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)4.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)63.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)3.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle3.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription94.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate83.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population6.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households44.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+16.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age41.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$126,261$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$382,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$1,420$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.9 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 81.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured